» Articles » PMID: 31976457

Out of the Lab: Shaping an Ecological and Constructional Cultural Systems Science

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2020 Jan 25
PMID 31976457
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contemporary societies face critical, interlocking, "wicked" challenges, including economic inequities and marginalization, personal and collective violence, ethnic and religious conflicts, degradation of "the commons," climate change, and more, and all of these issues clearly are grounded in behavior. An adequate culturo-behavior science could be positioned to advance and leverage research and interventions supporting community well-being, and contribute to overcoming urgent societal and global challenges. The current state of cultural systems science, however, is limited by theory and methodology, and by competition for attention with well-established research and practice opportunities related to individual-level challenges. In this article, the author explores those limitations, and suggests a more expansive perspective drawing on historical and contemporary ecological science and contemporary theories of complex systems. Research guided by established science within those disciplines offers opportunities to move cultural systems science out of the lab, and into a more adequate, environmentally rich stance drawing on ecological strategies, recursively integrating contextual observations, conceptual advances, and in vivo experimentation. Examples of each of those strategies and exploration of developmental programs of research grounded in such integration are explored.

Citing Articles

Measuring the Dissemination Impact of Culturo-Behavioral Science.

Gelino B, Critchfield T, Reed D Behav Soc Issues. 2024; :1-27.

PMID: 38625108 PMC: 10014132. DOI: 10.1007/s42822-022-00120-3.


Research and Training in Culturo-Behavior Science.

Cihon T, Borba A, Benvenuti M, Sandaker I Behav Soc Issues. 2024; 30(1):237-275.

PMID: 38624823 PMC: 8635479. DOI: 10.1007/s42822-021-00076-w.


Willingness to produce disadvantageous outcomes in cooperative tasks is modulated by recent experience.

Lionello-DeNolf K, Benvenuti M, Suarez C Learn Behav. 2022; 51(2):135-152.

PMID: 35181855 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00508-y.


Tutorial. A Behavioral Analysis of Rationality, Nudging, and Boosting: Implications for Policymaking.

Tagliabue M Perspect Behav Sci. 2022; 46(1):89-118.

PMID: 35103249 PMC: 8791424. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00324-9.


Relations between Description and Experimentation in the Metacontingency Enterprise: An Interbehavioral Analysis.

Fleming W, Hayes L Perspect Behav Sci. 2021; 44(2-3):417-472.

PMID: 34632284 PMC: 8476708. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00286-y.


References
1.
Glenn S . Windows on the 21st century. Behav Anal. 2012; 16(2):133-51. PMC: 2733628. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392619. View

2.
Goldiamond I . Toward a constructional approach to social problems: ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behaviorism. 1974; 2(1):1-84. View

3.
Rehfeldt R . Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: an analysis of articles published in the journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992-2009. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011; 44(1):109-19. PMC: 3050465. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109. View

4.
Eagleman D . Why public dissemination of science matters: a manifesto. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(30):12147-9. PMC: 6618668. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2556-13.2013. View

5.
Moore J . Behavior analysis, mentalism, and the path to social justice. Behav Anal. 2012; 26(2):181-93. PMC: 2731454. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392075. View