A Scoping Review and Mapping Exercise Comparing the Content of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Across Heart Disease-specific Scales

Overview

Journal J Patient Rep Outcomes

Specialty Health Services

Date 2020 Jan 25

PMID 31974688

Citations 13

Authors

Beatrix Alguren

Michaela Coenen

Dan Malm

Bengt Fridlund

Jan Martensson

Kristofer Arestedt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade, the importance of person-centered care has led to increased interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In cardiovascular care, selecting an appropriate PROM for clinical use or research is challenging because multimorbidity is often common in patients. The aim was therefore to provide an overview of heart-disease specific PROMs and to compare the content of those outcomes using a bio-psycho-social framework of health.

Methods: A scoping review of heart disease-specific PROMs, including arrhythmia/atrial fibrillation, congenital heart disease, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and valve diseases was conducted in PubMed (January 2018). All items contained in the disease-specific PROMs were mapped to WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) according to standardized linking rules.

Results: A total of 34 PROMs (heart diseases in general n = 5; cardiac arrhythmia n = 6; heart failure n = 14; ischemic heart disease n = 9) and 147 ICF categories were identified. ICF categories covered Body functions (n = 61), Activities & Participation (n = 69), and Environmental factors (n = 17). Most items were about experienced problems of Body functions and less often about patients' daily activities, and most PROMs were specifically developed for heart failure and no PROM were identified for valve disease or congenital heart disease.

Conclusions: Our results motivate and provide information to develop comprehensive PROMs that consider activity and participation by patients with various types of heart disease.

Citing Articles

Using Implementation Science to Evaluate the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a Clinical Heart Failure Care Setting.

Lawrason S, Ross H, McDonald M, Posada J, Engbers S, Simard A CJC Open. 2024; 6(12):1443-1452.

PMID: 39735955 PMC: 11681351. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.012.

The effect of positive mental well-being on patient reported outcome (PRO): finding from a cross-sectional multi-disease study in China.

Yang Z, Luo N, Hong Y Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):100.

PMID: 39550577 PMC: 11568534. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02314-2.

Measurement properties of utility-based health-related quality of life measures in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs: a systematic review.

Bulamu N, Gebremichael L, Hines S, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Pearson V, Dafny H Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(9):2299-2320.

PMID: 38961008 PMC: 11390805. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03657-5.

Are disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) used in cardiogenetics? A systematic review.

van Pottelberghe S, Kupper N, Scheirlynck E, Amin A, Wilde A, Hofman N Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 32(6):607-618.

PMID: 38097768 PMC: 11153546. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01510-w.

Translation and evaluation of the HeartQoL in patients with coronary heart disease in Iceland.

Svavarsdottir M, Ingadottir B, Oldridge N, Arestedt K Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023; 21(1):84.

PMID: 37559128 PMC: 10410800. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02161-7.

References

Fayed N, Cieza A, Bickenbach J . Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: a systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(21-22):1941-51. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.553704. View

Wood K, Stewart A, Drew B, Scheinman M, Frolicher E . Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Patient Perspective of Arrhythmia Questionnaire. Res Nurs Health. 2009; 32(5):504-16. PMC: 2953868. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20347. View

Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G . ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37(4):212-8. DOI: 10.1080/16501970510040263. View

Wilson A, Wiklund I, Lahti T, Wahl M . A summary index for the assessment of quality of life in angina pectoris. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(9):981-8. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90069-l. View

Rukholm E, McGirr M . A quality-of-life index for clients with ischemic heart disease: establishing reliability and validity. Rehabil Nurs. 1994; 19(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1994.tb01296.x. View

Bradley S, Strauss C, Ho P . Value in cardiovascular care. Heart. 2017; 103(16):1238-1243. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309753. View

Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E . Person-centered care--ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011; 10(4):248-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008. View

Ulla W, Anna S, Arestedt K . Development and validation of an arrhythmia-specific scale in tachycardia and arrhythmia with focus on health-related quality of life. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014; 30(2):98-108. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000149. View

Kamphuis M, Zwinderman K, Vogels T, Vliegen H, Kamphuis R, Ottenkamp J . A cardiac-specific health-related quality of life module for young adults with congenital heart disease: development and validation. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(4):735-45. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021690.84029.a3. View

10.

Heo S, Moser D, Pressler S, Dunbar S, Mudd-Martin G, Lennie T . Psychometric properties of the Symptom Status Questionnaire-Heart Failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014; 30(2):136-44. PMC: 4391745. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000102. View

11.

Marquis P, Fayol C, Joire J . Clinical validation of a quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patients. Eur Heart J. 1995; 16(11):1554-60. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060777. View

12.

Walfridsson U, Arestedt K, Stromberg A . Development and validation of a new Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) with focus on symptom burden. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012; 10:44. PMC: 3430592. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-44. View

13.

Baumhauer J, Bozic K . Value-based Healthcare: Patient-reported Outcomes in Clinical Decision Making. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(6):1375-8. PMC: 4868147. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4813-4. View

14.

Green C, Porter C, Bresnahan D, Spertus J . Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(5):1245-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00531-3. View

15.

Fu T, Lin Y, Chang C, Chou W, Yuan P, Liu M . Validation of a new simple scale to measure symptoms in heart failure from traditional Chinese medicine view: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016; 16:342. PMC: 5010704. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1306-7. View

16.

Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S . Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002; 34(5):205-10. DOI: 10.1080/165019702760279189. View

17.

Thompson D, Ski C, Garside J, Astin F . A review of health-related quality of life patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular nursing. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016; 15(2):114-25. DOI: 10.1177/1474515116637980. View

18.

Lewin R, Thompson D, Martin C, Stuckey N, Devlen J, Michaelson S . Validation of the Cardiovascular Limitations and Symptoms Profile (CLASP) in chronic stable angina. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2002; 22(3):184-91. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200205000-00010. View

19.

Ferrans C, Powers M . Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1985; 8(1):15-24. DOI: 10.1097/00012272-198510000-00005. View

20.

Hlatky M, Boineau R, Higginbotham M, Lee K, Mark D, Califf R . A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64(10):651-4. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7. View