» Articles » PMID: 31974592

Comparative Proteomic and Genomic Analyses of Brucella Abortus Biofilm and Planktonic Cells

Overview
Journal Mol Med Rep
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2020 Jan 25
PMID 31974592
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to explore the differences in protein and gene expression of Brucella abortus cultured under biofilm and planktonic conditions. The proteins unique to biofilms and planktonic B. abortus were separated by two‑dimensional (2‑D) electrophoresis and then identified by matrix‑assisted laser desorption/ionization‑tandem time of flight‑mass spectrometry (MALDI‑TOF/TOF‑MS). High‑throughput sequencing and bioinformatic analyses were performed to identify differentially expressed genes between B. abortus cultured under biofilm and planktonic conditions. The proteins and genes identified by proteomic and genomic analyses were further evaluated via western blot and reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) analyses. 2‑D electrophoresis identified 20 differentially expressed protein spots between biofilms and planktonic cells, which corresponded to 18 individual proteins (12 downregulated and 6 upregulated) after MALDI‑TOF/TOF‑MS analysis, including elongation factor Tu and enolase. RT‑qPCR analysis revealed that all of the 18 genes were downregulated in biofilms compared with planktonic cells. Western blot analysis identified 9 downregulated and 3 upregulated proteins. High‑throughput sequencing and bioinformatic analyses identified 14 function and pathway‑associated genes (e.g., BAbS19_I14970). RT‑qPCR analysis of the 14 genes showed that they were upregulated in biofilm compared with in planktonic state. In conclusion, these differentially expressed genes may play important roles in bacterial defense, colonization, invasion, and virulence.

Citing Articles

How to study biofilms: technological advancements in clinical biofilm research.

Cleaver L, Garnett J Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1335389.

PMID: 38156318 PMC: 10753778. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1335389.


Brucellae as resilient intracellular pathogens: epidemiology, host-pathogen interaction, recent genomics and proteomics approaches, and future perspectives.

Dawood A, Elrashedy A, Nayel M, Salama A, Guo A, Zhao G Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1255239.

PMID: 37876633 PMC: 10591102. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1255239.


The Flagellar Transcriptional Regulator FtcR Controls 16M Biofilm Formation via a -Mediated Pathway in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress.

Guo J, Deng X, Zhang Y, Song S, Zhao T, Zhu D Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(17).

PMID: 36077302 PMC: 9456535. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179905.


Evaluation of the differences between biofilm and planktonic Brucella abortus via metabolomics and proteomics.

Tang T, Xu Y, Wang J, Tan X, Zhao X, Zhou P Funct Integr Genomics. 2021; 21(3-4):421-433.

PMID: 34009538 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-021-00788-7.


Uncovering the Hidden Credentials of Virulence.

Roop 2nd R, Barton I, Hopersberger D, Martin D Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2021; 85(1).

PMID: 33568459 PMC: 8549849. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00021-19.


References
1.
Wang L, Wang S, Li W . RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(16):2184-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356. View

2.
Kumon H, Ono N, Iida M, Nickel J . Combination effect of fosfomycin and ofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa growing in a biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39(5):1038-44. PMC: 162679. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.5.1038. View

3.
Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley D . Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012; 7(3):562-78. PMC: 3334321. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. View

4.
Ashburner M, Ball C, Blake J, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry J . Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25(1):25-9. PMC: 3037419. DOI: 10.1038/75556. View

5.
Pancholi V, Fischetti V . alpha-enolase, a novel strong plasmin(ogen) binding protein on the surface of pathogenic streptococci. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(23):14503-15. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.23.14503. View