» Articles » PMID: 31969965

Whole-body Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Background Body Signal Suppression in the Detection of Osseous and Extra-osseous Metastases

Overview
Journal Pol J Radiol
Publisher Termedia
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Jan 24
PMID 31969965
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the reproducibility of detection of osseous and extra-osseous metastases in cancer patients using whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (WB-DWIBS).

Material And Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 39 consecutive patients (21 females, 18 males; mean age 48 years) with metastases, who underwent WB-DWIBS on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Image analysis was performed independently by two blinded observers. Inter-observer agreement was assessed for the detection of osseous (spinal, appendicular) and extra-osseous (hepatic, pulmonary, nodal, and peritoneal) metastases.

Results: The overall inter-observer agreement of WB-DWIBS in the detection of osseous and extra-osseous metastases was excellent (κ = 0.887, agreement = 94.44%, = 0.001). There was excellent inter-observer agreement of both observers for the detection of osseous spinal (κ = 0.846, agreement = 92.3%), osseous appendicular (κ = 0.898, agreement = 94.8 %), hepatic (κ = 0.847, agreement = 92.3%), pulmonary (κ = 0.938, agreement = 97.4%), nodal metastases (κ = 0.856, agreement = 94.9%), and peritoneal metastasis (κ = 0.772, agreement = 94.9%).

Conclusion: We concluded that WB-DWIBS is reproducible for detection of osseous and extra-osseous metastases in cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient in the detection, staging, and grading of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Razek A, Tawfik A, Rahman M, Teima S, Batouty N Pol J Radiol. 2023; 88:e177-e186.

PMID: 37057202 PMC: 10086610. DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2023.126393.


Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for a Sacral Metastasis Clarified by Diffusion-Weighted Whole-Body Imaging With Background Body Signal Suppression in a Patient With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Katano A, Takeuchi K, Yamashita H, Nakagawa K Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23047.

PMID: 35464507 PMC: 9001865. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23047.


Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of WB-DWI and clinical parameters in multiple myeloma.

Zhang B, Bian B, Zhao Z, Lin F, Zhu Z, Lou M BMC Med Imaging. 2021; 21(1):98.

PMID: 34103001 PMC: 8186136. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00631-2.


Detecting recurrent prostate Cancer using multiparametric MRI, influence of PSA and Gleason grade.

Venkatesan A, Mudairu-Dawodu E, Duran C, Stafford R, Yan Y, Wei W Cancer Imaging. 2021; 21(1):3.

PMID: 33407861 PMC: 7789281. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00373-4.


Radiation-induced occult insufficiency fracture or bone metastasis after radiotherapy for cervical cancer? The nomogram based on quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients for discrimination.

Zhong X, Jiang H, Mai H, Xiang J, Li J, Huang Z Cancer Imaging. 2020; 20(1):76.

PMID: 33097093 PMC: 7583230. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00353-8.


References
1.
Razek A, Ezzat A, Azmy E, Tharwat N . Role of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in treatment planning for multiple myeloma. Radiol Med. 2012; 118(5):799-805. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0880-0. View

2.
Padhani A, Koh D, Collins D . Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions. Radiology. 2011; 261(3):700-18. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110474. View

3.
Razek A, Talaat M, El-Serougy L, Gaballa G, Abdelsalam M . Clinical Applications of Arterial Spin Labeling in Brain Tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019; 43(4):525-532. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000873. View

4.
Abdel Razek A . Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of chest tumors. Cancer Imaging. 2012; 12:452-63. PMC: 3483598. DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0041. View

5.
Razek A, Soliman N, Elashery R . Apparent diffusion coefficient values of mediastinal masses in children. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(6):1311-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.008. View