» Articles » PMID: 31969810

Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Jan 24
PMID 31969810
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

"Social facilitation" refers to the enhancement or impairment of performance engendered by the mere presence of others. It has been demonstrated for a diversity of behaviors. This study assessed whether it also concerns attention and eye movements and if yes, which decision-making mechanisms it affects. Human volunteers were tested in three different tasks (saccades, visual search, and continuous performance) either alone or in the presence of a familiar peer. The results failed to reveal any significant peer influence on the visual search and continuous performance tasks. For saccades, by contrast, they showed a negative or positive peer influence depending on the complexity of the testing protocol. Pro-and anti-saccades were both inhibited when pseudorandomly mixed, and both facilitated when performed separately. Peer presence impaired or improved reaction times, i.e., the speed to initiate the saccade, as well as peak velocity, i.e., the driving force moving the eye toward the target. Effect sizes were large, with Cohen's -values ranging for reaction times (RTs) from 0.50 to 0.95. Analyzing RT distributions using the LATER (Linear Approach to Threshold with Ergodic Rate) model revealed that social inhibition of pro- and anti-saccades in the complex protocol was associated with a significant increase in the rate of rise. The present demonstration that the simple presence of a familiar peer can inhibit or facilitate saccades depending on task difficulty strengthens a growing body of evidence showing social modulations of eye movements and attention processes. The present lack of effect on visual search and continuous performance tasks contrasts with peer presence effects reported earlier using similar tasks, and future studies are needed to determine whether it is due to an intermediate level of difficulty maximizing individual variability. Together with an earlier study of the social inhibition of anti-saccades also using the LATER model, which showed an increase of the threshold, the present increase of the rate of rise suggests that peer presence can influence both the top-down and bottom-up attention-related processes guiding the decision to move the eyes.

Citing Articles

AI can see you: Machiavellianism and extraversion are reflected in eye-movements.

Tsigeman E, Zemliak V, Likhanov M, Papageorgiou K, Kovas Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308631.

PMID: 39196880 PMC: 11355565. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308631.


Unraveling dyadic psycho-physiology of social presence between strangers during an audio drama - a signal-analysis approach.

Kauttonen J, Paekivi S, Kauramaki J, Tikka P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1153968.

PMID: 37928563 PMC: 10622809. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153968.


How Does the Presence of Others Influence Control Inhibition? Contradictory Evidence Using an Antisaccade and Stop Signal Task.

Garcia-Marques T, Fernandes A Psychol Rep. 2023; 127(6):3044-3065.

PMID: 36656260 PMC: 11529125. DOI: 10.1177/00332941231153328.


Peer Presence Effect on Numerosity and Phonological Comparisons in 4th Graders: When Working with a SchoolMate Makes Children More Adult-like.

Tricoche L, Monfardini E, Reynaud A, Epinat-Duclos J, Pelisson D, Prado J Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(9).

PMID: 34571779 PMC: 8470134. DOI: 10.3390/biology10090902.


The role of chronotype and reward processing in understanding social hierarchies in adolescence.

Lunn J, Wilcockson T, Donovan T, Dondelinger F, Perez Algorta G, Monaghan P Brain Behav. 2021; 11(5):e02090.

PMID: 33645918 PMC: 8119846. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2090.


References
1.
Liu N, Yu R . Influence of social presence on eye movements in visual search tasks. Ergonomics. 2017; 60(12):1667-1681. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1342870. View

2.
Monfardini E, Reynaud A, Prado J, Meunier M . Social modulation of cognition: Lessons from rhesus macaques relevant to education. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 82:45-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.002. View

3.
Izuma K, Saito D, Sadato N . Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(4):621-31. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21228. View

4.
Harkins S . Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(3):436-55. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.436. View

5.
Breiner K, Li A, Cohen A, Steinberg L, Bonnie R, Scott E . Combined effects of peer presence, social cues, and rewards on cognitive control in adolescents. Dev Psychobiol. 2018; 60(3):292-302. PMC: 8320682. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21599. View