» Articles » PMID: 31969584

Sea Lice Exposure to Non-lethal Levels of Emamectin Benzoate After Treatments: a Potential Risk Factor for Drug Resistance

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Jan 24
PMID 31969584
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The avermectin derivative emamectin benzoate (EMB) has been widely used by salmon industries around the world to control sea lice infestations. Resistance to this anti-parasitic drug is also commonly reported in these industries. The objective of this study was to quantify the number of sea lice potentially exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of EMB while fish clear the drug after treatments. We assessed juvenile sea lice abundance after 38 EMB treatments on six Atlantic salmon farms, in a small archipelago in British Colombia, Canada, between 2007 and 2018. We fitted a standard EMB pharmacokinetic curve to determine the time when fish treated with this product would have EMB tissue concentrations below the recommended target therapeutic level. During the study, we estimated that for each sea lice treatment there was, on average, an abundance of 0.12 juvenile sea lice per fish during the time period when the concentrations of EMB would have been lower than 60ppb, the recommended therapeutic treatment level for sea lice. The findings from this study on metaphylactic anti-parasitic treatments identify a potential driver for drug resistance in sea lice that should be further explored.

Citing Articles

Insights from Hi-C data regarding the Pacific salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) sex chromosomes.

Flores A, Christensen K, Siah A, Koop B G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38683737 PMC: 11228835. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae087.


Biosafety, histological alterations and residue depletion of feed administered anti-parasitic drug emamectin benzoate in golden mahseer, (Hamilton, 1822) as a model candidate fish for sport fishery and conservation in temperate waters.

Mallik S, Singh S, Shahi N, Patil P, Kala K, Pathak R Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1106124.

PMID: 36843939 PMC: 9950520. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1106124.


Salmon lice in the Pacific Ocean show evidence of evolved resistance to parasiticide treatment.

Godwin S, Bateman A, Kuparinen A, Johnson R, Powell J, Speck K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4775.

PMID: 35347162 PMC: 8960799. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07464-1.


Characterization of miRNAs in Embryonic, Larval, and Adult Lumpfish Provides a Reference miRNAome for .

Chakraborty S, Woldemariam N, Visnovska T, Rise M, Boyce D, Santander J Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35053128 PMC: 8773022. DOI: 10.3390/biology11010130.


Emamectin Benzoate Treatment of Hybrid Grouper Infected With Sea Lice in Hong Kong.

St-Hilaire S, Cheng T, Chan S, Leung C, Chan K, Lim K Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:646652.

PMID: 33644159 PMC: 7907643. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.646652.

References
1.
Jones P, Hammell K, Dohoo I, Revie C . Effectiveness of emamectin benzoate for treatment of Lepeophtheirus salmonis on farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Dis Aquat Organ. 2012; 102(1):53-64. DOI: 10.3354/dao02517. View

2.
Kristoffersen A, Rees E, Stryhn H, Ibarra R, Campisto J, Revie C . Understanding sources of sea lice for salmon farms in Chile. Prev Vet Med. 2013; 111(1-2):165-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.03.015. View

3.
Westcott J, Stryhn H, Burka J, Hammell K . Optimization and field use of a bioassay to monitor sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis sensitivity to emamectin benzoate. Dis Aquat Organ. 2008; 79(2):119-31. DOI: 10.3354/dao01887. View

4.
Saksida S, Morrison D, McKenzie P, Milligan B, Downey E, Boyce B . Use of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., farm treatment data and bioassays to assess for resistance of sea lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, to emamectin benzoate (SLICE(®) ) in British Columbia, Canada. J Fish Dis. 2012; 36(5):515-20. DOI: 10.1111/jfd.12018. View

5.
Sevatdal S, Magnusson A, Ingebrigtsen K, Haldorsen R, Horsberg T . Distribution of emamectin benzoate in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 28(1):101-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00629.x. View