» Articles » PMID: 31967488

Healthy and Climate-Friendly Eating Patterns in the New Zealand Context

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 23
PMID 31967488
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The global food system is driving both the climate crisis and the growing burden of noncommunicable disease. International research has highlighted the climate and health co-benefit opportunity inherent in widespread uptake of plant-based diets. Nevertheless, uncertainty remains as to what constitutes healthy and climate-friendly eating patterns in specific world regions.

Objectives: Using New Zealand as a case study, this research investigates the extent to which potential contextual differences may affect the local applicability of international trends. It further examines the potential for demand-end avenues to support a transition toward a healthier, more climate-friendly food system in New Zealand.

Methods: A New Zealand-specific life-cycle assessment (LCA) database was developed by modifying cradle to point-of-sale reference emissions estimates according to the New Zealand context. This food emissions database, together with a New Zealand-specific multistate life-table model, was then used to estimate climate, health, and health system cost impacts associated with shifting current consumption to align with dietary scenarios that conform to the New Zealand dietary guidelines (NZDGs).

Results: Whole plant foods, including vegetables, fruits, legumes, and whole grains were substantially less climate-polluting () than animal-based foods, particularly red and processed meats (). Shifting population-level consumption to align with the NZDGs would confer diet-related emissions savings of 4-42%, depending on the degree of dietary change and food waste minimization pursued. NZDG-abiding dietary scenarios, when modeled out over the lifetime of the current New Zealand population, would also confer large health gains (1.0-1.5 million quality-adjusted life-years) and health care system cost savings ().

Discussion: Guideline-abiding dietary scenarios, particularly those that prioritize plant-based foods, have the potential to confer substantial climate and health gains. This research shows that major contextual differences specific to New Zealand's food system do not appear to cause notable deviation from global trends, reinforcing recent international research. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5996.

Citing Articles

Effect of Moderate Red Meat Intake Compared With Plant-Based Meat Alternative on Psychological Well-Being: A 10-Wk Cluster Randomized Intervention in Healthy Young Adults.

Conner T, Gillies N, Worthington A, Bermingham E, Haszard J, Knowles S Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 9(1):104507.

PMID: 39723334 PMC: 11666937. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104507.


Climate change impacts on Aotearoa New Zealand: a horizon scan approach.

Macinnis-Ng C, Ziedins I, Ajmal H, Baisden W, Hendy S, McDonald A J R Soc N Z. 2024; 54(4):523-546.

PMID: 39440125 PMC: 11459771. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2023.2267016.


Growing for good: producing a healthy, low greenhouse gas and water quality footprint diet in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

McDowell R, Herzig A, van der Weerden T, Cleghorn C, Kaye-Blake W J R Soc N Z. 2024; 54(3):325-349.

PMID: 39439877 PMC: 11459733. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2137532.


Green hospitals: Mitigating water footprint and greenhouse gas emissions through sustainable menu planning in Turkish state university hospitals.

Orucoglu B, Kemaloglu M, Kemaloglu E Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(8):5966-5978.

PMID: 39139955 PMC: 11317658. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4244.


The prevalence of vegetarians, vegans and other dietary patterns that exclude some animal-source foods in a representative sample of New Zealand adults.

Greenwell J, Grant M, Young L, MacKay S, Bradbury K Public Health Nutr. 2023; 27(1):e5.

PMID: 38050700 PMC: 10830381. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980023002677.


References
1.
Balcombe P, Speirs J, Brandon N, Hawkes A . Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018; 20(10):1323-1339. DOI: 10.1039/c8em00414e. View

2.
. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016; 388(10053):1659-1724. PMC: 5388856. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8. View

3.
Edwards P, Roberts I . Population adiposity and climate change. Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 38(4):1137-40. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp172. View

4.
Noss R . Local priorities can be too parochial for biodiversity. Nature. 2010; 463(7280):424. DOI: 10.1038/463424a. View

5.
Micha R, Michas G, Mozaffarian D . Unprocessed red and processed meats and risk of coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes--an updated review of the evidence. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012; 14(6):515-24. PMC: 3483430. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-012-0282-8. View