» Articles » PMID: 31967223

Complementarity of Modified NUTRIC Score with or Without C-reactive Protein and Subjective Global Assessment in Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 23
PMID 31967223
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the concordance between the modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein instruments in identifying nutritional risk patients and predicting mortality in critically ill patients. The risk of death in patient groups was also investigated according to nutritional risk and malnutrition detected by subjective global assessment.

Methods: A cohort study of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Nutritional risk was assessed by modified NUTRIC and a version of NUTRIC with C-reactive protein. Subjective global assessment was applied to diagnose malnutrition. Kappa statistics were calculated, and an ROC curve was constructed considering modified NUTRIC as a reference. The predictive validity was assessed considering mortality in 28 days (whether in the intensive care unit or after discharge) as the outcome.

Results: A total of 130 patients were studied (63.05 ± 16.46 years, 53.8% males). According to NUTRIC with C-reactive protein, 34.4% were classified as having a high score, while 28.5% of patients had this classification with modified NUTRIC. According to SGA 48.1% of patients were malnourished. There was excellent agreement between modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein (Kappa = 0.88, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was equal to 0.942 (0.881 - 1.000) for NUTRIC with C-reactive protein. The risk of death within 28 days was increased in patients with high modified NUTRIC (HR = 1.827; 95%CI 1.029 - 3.244; p = 0.040) and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein (HR = 2.685; 95%CI 1.423 - 5.064; p = 0.002) scores. A high risk of death was observed in patients with high nutritional risk and malnutrition, independent of the version of the NUTRIC score applied.

Conclusion: An excellent agreement between modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein was observed. In addition, combining NUTRIC and subjective global assessment may increase the accuracy of predicting mortality in critically ill patients.

Citing Articles

Clinical practice guidelines for nutritional assessment and monitoring of adult ICU patients in China.

Guan X, Chen D, Xu Y J Intensive Med. 2024; 4(2):137-159.

PMID: 38681796 PMC: 11043647. DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.12.002.


Prognostic values of modified NUTRIC score to assess outcomes in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care units: prospective observational study.

Mahmoodpoor A, Sanaie S, Sarfaraz T, Shadvar K, Fattahi V, Hamishekar H BMC Anesthesiol. 2023; 23(1):131.

PMID: 37081414 PMC: 10116464. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02086-0.


Comparison of mNUTRIC-S2 and mNUTRIC scores to assess nutritional risk and predict intensive care unit mortality.

Kim S, Lee H, Choi S, Lee S, Lee J Acute Crit Care. 2022; 37(4):618-626.

PMID: 36330740 PMC: 9732204. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2022.00612.


Significance of the Modified NUTRIC Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Tseng C, Tu C, Chen C, Wang Y, Chen W, Fu P Nutrients. 2022; 14(1).

PMID: 35011073 PMC: 8747298. DOI: 10.3390/nu14010198.


High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at intensive care unit admission is associated with nutrition risk in patients with COVID-19.

Martins P, Gomes T, Franco E, Vieira L, Pimentel G JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021; 46(6):1441-1448.

PMID: 34961953 PMC: 9015430. DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2318.


References
1.
Singer P, Reintam Blaser A, Berger M, Alhazzani W, Calder P, Casaer M . ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2018; 38(1):48-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. View

2.
Rahman A, Hasan R, Agarwala R, Martin C, Day A, Heyland D . Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the "modified NUTRIC" nutritional risk assessment tool. Clin Nutr. 2015; 35(1):158-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.015. View

3.
Moretti D, Bagilet D, Buncuga M, Settecase C, Quaglino M, Quintana R . [Study of two variants of nutritional risk score “NUTRIC” in ventilated critical patients]. Nutr Hosp. 2014; 29(1):166-72. DOI: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.1.7001. View

4.
Cui N, Zhang H, Chen Z, Yu Z . Prognostic significance of PCT and CRP evaluation for adult ICU patients with sepsis and septic shock: retrospective analysis of 59 cases. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47(4):1573-1579. PMC: 6460616. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518822404. View

5.
Coltman A, Peterson S, Roehl K, Roosevelt H, Sowa D . Use of 3 tools to assess nutrition risk in the intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 39(1):28-33. DOI: 10.1177/0148607114532135. View