» Articles » PMID: 31966788

Modified O-T Advancement Flap for Reconstruction of Skin Defects

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2020 Jan 23
PMID 31966788
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Round or oval defects are common in skin surgery. Functional and cosmetical reconstruction of defects in reparative process is critical for patients. Various flaps have been described, however, these flaps often result in longer scar or tip necrosis. To overcome these shortcomings, we modified O-T advancement flap on the basis of conventional O-T flap and observed the validity and complications during defect closure.

Materials And Methods: Defect transverse diameter was marked along the direction of minimum tension at the circular center. Extended line was drawn along defect transverse diameter with the same length of circular diameter. The skin was cut apart, and the flap was separated under the skin. Then the flap tips were sutured and fixed with the opposite center. After drainage, the defects were bandaged under compression.

Results: This study includes a total number of 48 patients. We examined the location and size of defect and postoperative clinical courses. The follow-up period was from 3 months to 1 year. Overall, 41 of 48 patients achieved the satisfactory postoperative effect. Recurrence and limb dysfunction complication was not observed, except 2 cases of wound scar, 3 cases of wound infect and 2 cases of flap tip necrosis.

Conclusion: Modified O-T advancement flap is practical and safety. It overcomes the shortcomings of traditional O-T flap. Reconstruction of modified O-T flap is aesthetically acceptable.

Citing Articles

Local flap guidance for scalp reconstruction following Mohs micrographic surgery.

Dowdle T, Chellappan B, Pinto-Cuberos J, Verma K, Armenta A, Winsett F Arch Dermatol Res. 2025; 317(1):193.

PMID: 39775952 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-03720-8.


Evaluation of bilateral interdigitated Pacman flap for reconstruction of skin defects in different parts of the body.

Albayati W, Qassim Y Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021; 103(9):e292-e297.

PMID: 34435505 PMC: 9774017. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0006.


Rhomboid flap: Indications, applications, techniques and results. A comprehensive review.

Kang A, Kang K Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 68:102544.

PMID: 34285803 PMC: 8278203. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102544.


Double Opposing Triangular Flaps for Circular Skin Defects: Clinical Considerations.

Borgognone A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 6(11):e2033.

PMID: 30881813 PMC: 6414096. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002033.

References
1.
Cho Y, Ryu D, Chung H, O T, Blei F, Waner M . Surgical Management of Scalp Infantile Hemangiomas. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26(4):1169-72. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001561. View

2.
Ying B . Adjacent flaps for lower lip reconstruction after mucocele resection. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23(2):556-7. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824cd67a. View

3.
Ring A, Kirchhoff P, Goertz O, Behr B, Daigeler A, Lehnhardt M . Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Defects at the Foot and Ankle after Oncological Resection. Front Surg. 2016; 3:15. PMC: 4781863. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00015. View

4.
Sari E, Tellioglu A, Altuntas N, Seven E, Ozakpinar H . Combination of rhomboid flap and double Z-plasty technique for reconstruction of palmar and dorsal web space burn contractures. Burns. 2014; 41(2):408-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.07.017. View

5.
Rovira-Lopez R, Pujol R, Toll A . Repair of a Defect of the Lateral Suprabrow. Dermatol Surg. 2016; 42(4):543-6. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000529. View