» Articles » PMID: 31966167

Habitat Preferences of Soprano Pipistrelle (Leach, 1825) and Common Pipistrelle (Schreber, 1774) in Two Different Woodlands in North East Scotland

Overview
Journal Zool Stud
Date 2020 Jan 23
PMID 31966167
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The habitat preferences of the soprano pipistrelle and the common pipistrelle living in sympatry, were investigated in north east Scotland, using bat detector transects. Bat flight, foraging and social activity in natural birch woodland was compared with that in managed non-native coniferous woodland. Each area consists of riparian habitat, meadow-forest ecotone and dense forest. The activity of bats was highest in riparian habitat, then meadow, and lowest in dense woodland. was more abundant than in both areas, although in managed coniferous woodland only narrowly so (43.7% of all recorded bat flights, compared to 40.0% for common pipistrelle). In natural birch woodland, meadow habitat was most preferred by , and there was no significant difference between the use of riparian and woodland habitats, whereas in coniferous woodland, riparian habitat was most preferred. in both sites preferred riparian habitat, then meadow and forest least of all. The foraging activity of soprano pipistrelles was higher in birch than in coniferous woodland, whereas for the common pipistrelle, it was more evenly distributed. In both sites the lowest number of feeding buzzes was recorded in dense forest. In both study areas social calls were recorded, but many more for than for , especially in birch woodland. Soprano pipistrelle is a specialist species, focused mostly on riparian habitat, whereas common pipistrelle shows more generalistic behaviour. High number of social calls recorded near the waterbodies could suggest, that such habitat partitioning could be caused also by competitive behaviour.

Citing Articles

Passing rail traffic reduces bat activity.

Jerem P, Mathews F Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):20671.

PMID: 34667234 PMC: 8526610. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00101-3.


Overlap in Cave Usage and Period of Activity as Factors Structuring the Interactions between Bats and Ectoparasites.

Fagundes R, Antonini Y, Aguiar L Zool Stud. 2020; 56:e22.

PMID: 31966221 PMC: 6517740. DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2017.56-22.


Habitat usage of Daubenton's bat (), common pipistrelle (), and soprano pipistrelle () in a North Wales upland river catchment.

Todd V, Williamson L Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(8):4853-4863.

PMID: 31031948 PMC: 6476770. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5085.

References
1.
Hulva P, Horacek I, Strelkov P, Benda P . Molecular architecture of Pipistrellus pipistrellus/Pipistrellus pygmaeus complex (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): further cryptic species and Mediterranean origin of the divergence. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004; 32(3):1023-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.007. View

2.
Birch L . The effect of species of animals which share common resources on one another's distribution and abundance. Fortschr Zool. 1979; 25(2-3):197-221. View

3.
Mayer F, Von Helversen O . Cryptic diversity in European bats. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1478):1825-32. PMC: 1088815. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1744. View

4.
Jones G, Van Parijs S . Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present?. Proc Biol Sci. 1993; 251(1331):119-25. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0017. View

5.
Barratt E, Deaville R, Burland T, Bruford M, Jones G, Racey P . DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature. 1997; 387(6629):138-9. DOI: 10.1038/387138b0. View