» Articles » PMID: 31966128

Recolonizing Wolves Influence the Realized Niche of Resident Cougars

Overview
Journal Zool Stud
Date 2020 Jan 23
PMID 31966128
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Niche differentiation may betray current, ongoing competition between two sympatric species or reflect evolutionary responses to historic competition that drove species apart. The best opportunity to test whether ongoing competition contributes to niche differentiation is to test for behavioral shifts by the subordinate competitor in controlled experiments in which the abundance of the dominant competitor is manipulated. Because these circumstances are difficult to coordinate in natural settings for wide-ranging species, researchers seize opportunities presented by species reintroductions. We tested for new competition between reintroduced wolves and resident cougars in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem to assess whether wolves might be impacting the realized niche of sympatric cougars.

Results: Between2002 and 2012, a period during which wolves increased from 15 to as high as 91 in the study area, cougars significantly increased the percentage of deer and decreased the percentage of elk in their diet in summer. Our top models explaining these changes identified elk availability, defined as the number of elk per wolf each year, as the strongest predictor of changing cougar prey selection. Both elk and deer were simultaneously declining in the system, though deer more quickly than elk, and wolf numbers increased exponentially during the same time frame. Therefore,we concluded that prey availability did not explain prey switching and that competition with wolves at least partially explained cougar prey switching from elk to deer. We also recorded 5 marked cougar kittens killed by wolves and 2 more that were killed by an undetermined predator. In addition, between 2005 and 2012, 9 adult cougars and 10 cougar kittens died of starvation, which may also be in part explained by competition with wolves.

Conclusions: Direct interspecific predation and shifting cougar prey selection as wolves increased in the system provided evidence for competition between recolonizing wolves and resident cougars. Through competition, recolonizing wolves have impacted the realized niche of resident cougars in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem (SYE), and current resident cougars may now exhibit a realized niche more reflective of an era when these species were previously sympatric in the Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Citing Articles

Organic contaminants as an ecological tool to explore niche partitioning: a case study using three pelagic shark species.

Lyons K, Kacev D, Preti A, Gillett D, Dewar H Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):12080.

PMID: 31427708 PMC: 6700177. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48521-6.


Multiple anthropogenic interventions drive puma survival following wolf recovery in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Elbroch L, Marescot L, Quigley H, Craighead D, Wittmer H Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(14):7236-7245.

PMID: 30073082 PMC: 6065371. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4264.


An adaptable but threatened big cat: density, diet and prey selection of the Indochinese leopard () in eastern Cambodia.

Rostro-Garcia S, Kamler J, Crouthers R, Sopheak K, Prum S, In V R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(2):171187.

PMID: 29515839 PMC: 5830728. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171187.


Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?.

Elbroch L, Kusler A PeerJ. 2018; 6:e4293.

PMID: 29379688 PMC: 5786880. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4293.


Bed site selection by a subordinate predator: an example with the cougar () in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Kusler A, Elbroch L, Quigley H, Grigione M PeerJ. 2017; 5:e4010.

PMID: 29158967 PMC: 5691788. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4010.


References
1.
Sikes R . 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J Mammal. 2018; 97(3):663-688. PMC: 5909806. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. View

2.
Elbroch L, Wittmer H . Nuisance ecology: do scavenging condors exact foraging costs on pumas in Patagonia?. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e53595. PMC: 3536754. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053595. View

3.
Garrott R, Bruggeman J, Becker M, Kalinowski S, White P . Evaluating prey switching in wolf-ungulate systems. Ecol Appl. 2007; 17(6):1588-97. DOI: 10.1890/06-1439.1. View

4.
Griffin K, Hebblewhite M, Robinson H, Zager P, Barber-Meyer S, Christianson D . Neonatal mortality of elk driven by climate, predator phenology and predator community composition. J Anim Ecol. 2011; 80(6):1246-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01856.x. View

5.
Nelson A, Kauffman M, Middleton A, Jimenez M, McWhirter D, Barber J . Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Ecol Appl. 2013; 22(8):2293-307. DOI: 10.1890/11-1829.1. View