» Articles » PMID: 31962244

Incorporating Biological Structure into Machine Learning Models in Biomedicine

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Jan 22
PMID 31962244
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In biomedical applications of machine learning, relevant information often has a rich structure that is not easily encoded as real-valued predictors. Examples of such data include DNA or RNA sequences, gene sets or pathways, gene interaction or coexpression networks, ontologies, and phylogenetic trees. We highlight recent examples of machine learning models that use structure to constrain model architecture or incorporate structured data into model training. For machine learning in biomedicine, where sample size is limited and model interpretability is crucial, incorporating prior knowledge in the form of structured data can be particularly useful. The area of research would benefit from performant open source implementations and independent benchmarking efforts.

Citing Articles

Semisupervised Contrastive Learning for Bioactivity Prediction Using Cell Painting Image Data.

Bushiri Pwesombo D, Beese C, Schmied C, Sun H J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(2):528-543.

PMID: 39761993 PMC: 11776044. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00835.


Enhancing chemotherapy response prediction via matched colorectal tumor-organoid gene expression analysis and network-based biomarker selection.

Zhang W, Wu C, Huang H, Bleu P, Zambare W, Alvarez J Transl Oncol. 2025; 52():102238.

PMID: 39754813 PMC: 11754497. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102238.


DMOIT: denoised multi-omics integration approach based on transformer multi-head self-attention mechanism.

Liu Z, Park T Front Genet. 2024; 15:1488683.

PMID: 39720180 PMC: 11666520. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1488683.


Knowledge-slanted random forest method for high-dimensional data and small sample size with a feature selection application for gene expression data.

Cantor E, Guauque-Olarte S, Leon R, Chabert S, Salas R BioData Min. 2024; 17(1):34.

PMID: 39256872 PMC: 11389072. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-024-00388-8.


Predicting gene-level sensitivity to JAK-STAT signaling perturbation using a mechanistic-to-machine learning framework.

Cheemalavagu N, Shoger K, Cao Y, Michalides B, Botta S, Faeder J Cell Syst. 2024; 15(1):37-48.e4.

PMID: 38198893 PMC: 10812086. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.12.006.


References
1.
Hofree M, Shen J, Carter H, Gross A, Ideker T . Network-based stratification of tumor mutations. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(11):1108-15. PMC: 3866081. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2651. View

2.
Sahraeian S, Liu R, Lau B, Podesta K, Mohiyuddin M, Lam H . Deep convolutional neural networks for accurate somatic mutation detection. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):1041. PMC: 6399298. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09027-x. View

3.
Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J . STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 43(Database issue):D447-52. PMC: 4383874. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1003. View

4.
Xi J, Li A, Wang M . A novel network regularized matrix decomposition method to detect mutated cancer genes in tumour samples with inter-patient heterogeneity. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):2855. PMC: 5460199. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03141-w. View

5.
Staiger C, Cadot S, Kooter R, Dittrich M, Muller T, Klau G . A critical evaluation of network and pathway-based classifiers for outcome prediction in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34796. PMC: 3338754. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034796. View