» Articles » PMID: 31961967

Six-dimensional Quantitative DCE MR Multitasking of the Entire Abdomen: Method and Application to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Jan 22
PMID 31961967
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a quantitative DCE MRI technique enabling entire-abdomen coverage, free-breathing acquisition, 1-second temporal resolution, and T -based quantification of contrast agent concentration and kinetic modeling for the characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods: Segmented FLASH readouts following saturation-recovery preparation with randomized 3D Cartesian undersampling was used for incoherent data acquisition. MR Multitasking was used to reconstruct 6-dimensional images with 3 spatial dimensions, 1 T recovery dimension for dynamic T quantification, 1 respiratory dimension to resolve respiratory motion, and 1 DCE time dimension to capture the contrast kinetics. Sixteen healthy subjects and 14 patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC were recruited for the in vivo studies, and kinetic parameters v , K , v , and K were evaluated for each subject. Intersession repeatability of Multitasking DCE was assessed in 8 repeat healthy subjects. One-way unbalanced analysis of variance was performed between control and patient groups.

Results: In vivo studies demonstrated that v , K , and K of PDAC were significantly lower compared with nontumoral regions in the patient group (P = .002, .003, .004, respectively) and normal pancreas in the control group (P = .011, <.001, <.001, respectively), while v was significantly higher than nontumoral regions (P < .001) and healthy pancreas (P < .001). The kinetic parameters showed good in vivo repeatability (interclass correlation coefficient: v , 0.95; K , 0.98; v , 0.96; K , 0.99).

Conclusion: The proposed Multitasking DCE is promising for the quantification of vascular properties of PDAC. Quantitative DCE parameters were repeatable in vivo and showed significant differences between normal pancreas and both tumor and nontumoral regions in patients with PDAC.

Citing Articles

High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging to Detect Changes in Tumor Size and ADC, and Predict Adverse Biopsy Histology during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.

Saouaf R, Xie Y, Kim S, Raphael Y, Nguyen C, Luthringer D Cancer Res Commun. 2024; 4(3):938-945.

PMID: 38497678 PMC: 10967695. DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0009.


Retrospective quantification of clinical abdominal DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetics-informed deep learning: a proof-of-concept study.

Wu C, Wang N, Gaddam S, Wang L, Han H, Sung K Front Radiol. 2023; 3:1168901.

PMID: 37731600 PMC: 10507354. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1168901.


Multitasking dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can accurately differentiate chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Wang N, Gaddam S, Xie Y, Christodoulou A, Wu C, Ma S Front Oncol. 2023; 12:1007134.

PMID: 36686811 PMC: 9853434. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1007134.


4D Golden-Angle Radial MRI at Subsecond Temporal Resolution.

Feng L NMR Biomed. 2022; 36(2):e4844.

PMID: 36259951 PMC: 9845193. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4844.


Latest Advances in Image Acceleration: All Dimensions are Fair Game.

Munoz C, Fotaki A, Botnar R, Prieto C J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022; 57(2):387-402.

PMID: 36205716 PMC: 10092100. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28462.


References
1.
Smith D, Welch E, Li X, Arlinghaus L, Loveless M, Koyama T . Quantitative effects of using compressed sensing in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(15):4933-46. PMC: 3192434. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/018. View

2.
Wegner C, Hauge A, Gaustad J, Andersen L, Simonsen T, Galappathi K . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts. Acta Oncol. 2017; 56(12):1754-1762. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1343494. View

3.
Christodoulou A, Redler G, Clifford B, Liang Z, Halpern H, Epel B . Fast dynamic electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oxygen imaging using low-rank tensors. J Magn Reson. 2016; 270:176-182. PMC: 5127203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.07.006. View

4.
Wang N, Christodoulou A, Xie Y, Wang Z, Deng Z, Zhou B . Quantitative 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging of carotid vessel wall by fast T1 mapping using Multitasking. Magn Reson Med. 2018; 81(4):2302-2314. PMC: 6372333. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27553. View

5.
Wake N, Chandarana H, Rusinek H, Fujimoto K, Moy L, Sodickson D . Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?. Magn Reson Imaging. 2018; 52:16-23. PMC: 6102067. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.007. View