» Articles » PMID: 31960495

The NIH "BEST" Programs: Institutional Programs, the Program Evaluation, and Early Data

Overview
Journal FASEB J
Specialties Biology
Physiology
Date 2020 Jan 22
PMID 31960495
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biomedical research training has undergone considerable change over the past several years. At its core, the goal of graduate and postdoctoral training is to provide individuals with the skills and knowledge to become outstanding scientists and expand knowledge through the scientific method. Historically, graduate school training has focused on preparation for academic positions. Increasingly, however, a shift toward preparation for a wider range of career options has emerged. This is largely because most biomedical PhD graduates do not become Principal Investigators in academic laboratories. Here we describe an National Institutes of Health Common Fund program with the major goal of culture change for biomedical research training and training that prepares individuals for a broader expanse of careers in the biomedical research enterprise. These "Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training" (BEST) awards, issued in 2012 and 2013, provided support to institutions to develop innovative approaches to achieving these goals, as a complement to traditional training. Awardees were tasked with catalyzing change at their institutions and sharing best practices across the training community. Awardees were required to participate in a cross-site evaluation that assessed the impact of BEST activities on three main areas: (a) trainee confidence and knowledge to make career decisions, (b) influence of this added activity on time in training, and (c) ability of the institutions to sustain activities deemed to be beneficial. Here we present the fundamental approach to the BEST program and early evaluative data.

Citing Articles

Development and assessment of a sustainable PhD internship program supporting diverse biomedical career outcomes.

Brandt P, Whittington D, Wood K, Holmquist C, Nogueira A, Gaines C Elife. 2025; 12.

PMID: 39960056 PMC: 11832166. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91011.


A Retrospective Analysis of Career Outcomes in Neuroscience.

Ullrich L, Ogawa J, Jones-London M eNeuro. 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38724268 PMC: 11134307. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0054-24.2024.


A structured curriculum supporting biomedical trainees' transition into independent academic positions and early career success.

Perez-Oquendo M, Romano G, Farris D, Gandhi V, Wistuba I, Tillman R BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):379.

PMID: 38589919 PMC: 11000405. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05370-w.


Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States.

Chatterjee D, Nogueira A, Wefes I, Chalkley R, Sturzenegger Varvayanis S, Fuhrmann C PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0296246.

PMID: 38507371 PMC: 10954142. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296246.


From goal to outcome: Analyzing the progression of biomedical sciences PhD careers in a longitudinal study using an expanded taxonomy.

Brown A, Meyers L, Varadarajan J, Ward N, Cartailler J, Chalkley R FASEB Bioadv. 2023; 5(11):427-452.

PMID: 37936923 PMC: 10626162. DOI: 10.1096/fba.2023-00072.