Gender Stereotypes and Incremental Beliefs in STEM and Non-STEM Students in Three Countries: Relationships with Performance in Cognitive Tasks

Overview

Journal Psychol Res

Specialty Psychology

Date 2020 Jan 22

PMID 31960121

Citations 15

Authors

Angelica Moe

Markus Hausmann

Marco Hirnstein

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Women's underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) has been linked, among others, to gender stereotypes and ability-related beliefs as well as gender differences in specific cognitive abilities. However, the bulk of studies focused on gender stereotypes related to mathematics. The present study, therefore, aimed to map gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs (i.e., the conviction about modifiability) with respect to a wide range of stereotypical male-favouring and female-favouring abilities. Gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs were assessed with self-report questionnaires in 132 STEM students (65 women) and 124 non-STEM students (73 women) in three European countries ranked in the top, middle, and bottom of the Global Gender Gap Report. Moreover, a mental rotation and a verbal fluency test were completed. Men endorsed male-favouring stereotypes more than women, and women endorsed female-favouring stereotypes more than men, an effect that was most pronounced in the country with the larger gender gap. Male STEM students endorsed male-favouring stereotypes more strongly than male non-STEM and female STEM students. Male non-STEM students endorsed female-favouring stereotypes less than female and male STEM students. Female STEM students reported higher incremental beliefs than female non-STEM students, especially in the country with the lowest gender gap. Men outperformed women, and STEM students outperformed non-STEM in mental rotation, while women outperformed men in verbal fluency. Male STEM students' stronger endorsement of male-favouring stereotypes might reflect genuine group differences, at least in mental rotation. While potentially such gender stereotypes can help creating a "chilly climate" where women in academic STEM degrees are expected to perform poorly, those women believed more in the possibility to change and improve in male-favouring abilities which could help them to overcome the potential negative effect of stereotyping.

Citing Articles

Supplementary motor area is deactivated during mental rotation tasks with biomechanical constraints in fMRI.

Nomura M, Koeda M, Ikeda Y, Tateno A, Arakawa R, Aoyagi Y Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1455587.

PMID: 39450317 PMC: 11499090. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1455587.

The reinforcement sensitivity theory affects questionnaire (RST-AQ). A validation study of a new scale targeting affects related to anxiety, approach motivation and fear.

Franchina V, Klackl J, Jonas E Curr Psychol. 2024; 43(6):5193-5205.

PMID: 38524832 PMC: 10959810. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-04623-z.

The perceived role fit of women and men academics: evidence from the social sports sciences.

Lesch L, Scharfenkamp K, Wicker P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1239944.

PMID: 38054178 PMC: 10694299. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1239944.

The influence of the design of mental rotation trials on performance and possible differences between sexes: A theoretical review and experimental investigation.

Jost L, Jansen P Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(6):1250-1271.

PMID: 37644655 PMC: 11103899. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231200127.

The role of perspective-taking in suppressing stereotypes about mathematics.

Yamamoto M, Oka T BMC Res Notes. 2023; 16(1):189.

PMID: 37644552 PMC: 10466689. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06460-6.

References

Blackwell L, Trzesniewski K, Dweck C . Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 2007; 78(1):246-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x. View

Bull R, Benson P . Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude. Horm Behav. 2006; 50(2):194-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.02.008. View

Carnes M, Devine P, Baier Manwell L, Byars-Winston A, Fine E, Ford C . The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med. 2014; 90(2):221-30. PMC: 4310758. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552. View

Ceci S, Ginther D, Kahn S, Williams W . Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015; 15(3):75-141. DOI: 10.1177/1529100614541236. View

Ceci S, Williams W, Barnett S . Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(2):218-61. DOI: 10.1037/a0014412. View

Cvencek D, Meltzoff A, Greenwald A . Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Dev. 2011; 82(3):766-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x. View

Halari R, Hines M, Kumari V, Mehrotra R, Wheeler M, Ng V . Sex differences and individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadotropins. Behav Neurosci. 2005; 119(1):104-17. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.104. View

Halpern D, Tan U . Stereotypes and steroids: using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain Cogn. 2001; 45(3):392-414. DOI: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1287. View

Hausmann M, Schoofs D, Rosenthal H, Jordan K . Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences--a psychobiosocial approach. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008; 34(3):389-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.09.019. View

10.

Herlitz A, Airaksinen E, Nordstrom E . Sex differences in episodic memory: the impact of verbal and visuospatial ability. Neuropsychology. 1999; 13(4):590-7. DOI: 10.1037//0894-4105.13.4.590. View

11.

Hirnstein M, Coloma Andrews L, Hausmann M . Gender-stereotyping and cognitive sex differences in mixed- and same-sex groups. Arch Sex Behav. 2014; 43(8):1663-73. PMC: 4198804. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-014-0311-5. View

12.

Huber S, Nuerk H, Reips U, Soltanlou M . Individual differences influence two-digit number processing, but not their analog magnitude processing: a large-scale online study. Psychol Res. 2017; 83(7):1444-1464. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0964-5. View

13.

Leslie S, Cimpian A, Meyer M, Freeland E . Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science. 2015; 347(6219):262-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1261375. View

14.

Lugli L, DAscenzo S, Borghi A, Nicoletti R . Clock Walking and Gender: How Circular Movements Influence Arithmetic Calculations. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1599. PMC: 6167457. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01599. View

15.

Miller D, Halpern D . The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 18(1):37-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011. View

16.

Nosek B, Banaji M, Greenwald A . Math = male, me = female, therefore math not = me. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 83(1):44-59. View

17.

Reilly D . Gender, culture, and sex-typed cognitive abilities. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e39904. PMC: 3393715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039904. View

18.

Sanchis-Segura C, Aguirre N, Cruz-Gomez A, Solozano N, Forn C . Do Gender-Related Stereotypes Affect Spatial Performance? Exploring When, How and to Whom Using a Chronometric Two-Choice Mental Rotation Task. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1261. PMC: 6066687. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01261. View

19.

Scheuringer A, Wittig R, Pletzer B . Sex differences in verbal fluency: the role of strategies and instructions. Cogn Process. 2017; 18(4):407-417. PMC: 5688186. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0801-1. View

20.

Shepard R, Metzler J . Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science. 1971; 171(3972):701-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701. View