» Articles » PMID: 31959338

Incidence and Mortality from Cervical Cancer and Other Malignancies After Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Jan 22
PMID 31959338
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) are highly effective, it has been reported that treated women remain at increased risk of cervical and other cancers. Our aim is to explore the risk of developing or dying from cervical cancer and other human papillomavirus (HPV)- and non-HPV-related malignancies after CIN treatment and infer its magnitude compared with the general population.

Materials And Methods: Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligibility criteria: Studies with registry-based follow-up reporting cancer incidence or mortality after CIN treatment.

Data Synthesis: Summary effects were estimated using random-effects models.

Outcomes: Incidence rate of cervical cancer among women treated for CIN (per 100 000 woman-years). Relative risk (RR) of cervical cancer, other HPV-related anogenital tract cancer (vagina, vulva, anus), any cancer, and mortality, for women treated for CIN versus the general population.

Results: Twenty-seven studies were eligible. The incidence rate for cervical cancer after CIN treatment was 39 per 100 000 woman-years (95% confidence interval 22-69). The RR of cervical cancer was elevated compared with the general population (3.30, 2.57-4.24; P < 0.001). The RR was higher for women more than 50 years old and remained elevated for at least 20 years after treatment. The RR of vaginal (10.84, 5.58-21.10; P < 0.001), vulvar (3.34, 2.39-4.67; P < 0.001), and anal cancer (5.11, 2.73-9.55; P < 0.001) was also higher. Mortality from cervical/vaginal cancer was elevated, but our estimate was more uncertain (RR 5.04, 0.69-36.94; P = 0.073).

Conclusions: Women treated for CIN have a considerably higher risk to be later diagnosed with cervical and other HPV-related cancers compared with the general population. The higher risk of cervical cancer lasts for at least 20 years after treatment and is higher for women more than 50 years of age. Prolonged follow-up beyond the last screening round may be warranted for previously treated women.

Citing Articles

Predictive Value of Netrin-1 Expression and Ultrasonic Blood Flow in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Severity.

Liu B, Wei L, Wu L, Wang H, Wang H, Yu Q Int J Womens Health. 2025; 17():43-51.

PMID: 39802920 PMC: 11724656. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S492376.


CENPE is a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.

Peng P, Zheng J, He K, Wang K, Wang L, Zheng X Heliyon. 2025; 10(24):e40860.

PMID: 39759304 PMC: 11698922. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40860.


Exploring the Intricacies of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Its Connection with HPV: A Narrative Review.

Karimi P, Reza Hosseini S, Mousavian Hiagh Z, Aboulhassanzadeh S, Asghari N, Aghazadeh H Iran J Public Health. 2025; 53(12):2671-2682.

PMID: 39759206 PMC: 11693788.


Effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on HPV infection and recurrence of HPV related disease after local surgical treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cao Q, Hou Y, Wang C, Yin J PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0312128.

PMID: 39739895 PMC: 11687797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312128.


Immunization in women's lives: present and future.

da Silva A, Marinho A, Santos A, Maia A, Roteli-Martins C, Fernandes C Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024; 46.

PMID: 39530068 PMC: 11554336. DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024FPS10.


References
1.
Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Gondry J, Petry K, Paraskevaidis E . Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer. BMJ. 2014; 348:f7700. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f7700. View

2.
Rebolj M, Helmerhorst T, Habbema D, Looman C, Boer R, van Rosmalen J . Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 345:e6855. PMC: 3487103. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e6855. View

3.
Kalliala I, Dyba T, Nieminen P, Hakulinen T, Anttila A . Mortality in a long-term follow-up after treatment of CIN. Int J Cancer. 2009; 126(1):224-31. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24713. View

4.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C . Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315(7109):629-34. PMC: 2127453. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. View

5.
Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya G, Ehlen T, Coldman A . Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(10):721-8. PMC: 2684554. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp089. View