» Articles » PMID: 31953370

Optogenetic Activation of the Basolateral Amygdala Promotes Both Appetitive Conditioning and the Instrumental Pursuit of Reward Cues

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Jan 19
PMID 31953370
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reward-associated stimuli can both evoke conditioned responses and acquire reinforcing properties in their own right, becoming avidly pursued. Such conditioned stimuli (CS) can guide reward-seeking behavior in adaptive (e.g., locating food) and maladaptive (e.g., binge eating) ways. The basolateral amygdala (BLA) regulates conditioned responses evoked by appetitive CS, but less is known about how the BLA contributes to the instrumental pursuit of CS. Here we studied the influence of BLA neuron activity on both behavioral effects. Water-restricted male rats learned to associate a light-tone cue (CS) with water delivery into a port. During these Pavlovian conditioning sessions, we paired CS presentations with photo-stimulation of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-expressing BLA neurons. BLA photo-stimulation potentiated CS-evoked port entries during conditioning, indicating enhanced conditioned approach and appetitive conditioning. Next, new rats received Pavlovian conditioning without photo-stimulation. These rats then received instrumental conditioning sessions where they could press an inactive lever or an active lever that produced CS presentation, without water delivery. Rats pressed more on the active versus inactive lever, and pairing CS presentation with BLA-ChR2 photo-stimulation intensified responding for the CS. This suggests that BLA-ChR2 photo-stimulation enhanced CS incentive value. In a separate experiment, rats did not reliably self-administer BLA-ChR2 stimulations, suggesting that BLA neurons do not carry a primary reward signal. Last, intra-BLA infusions of d-amphetamine also intensified lever-pressing for the CS. The findings suggest that BLA-mediated activity facilitates CS control over behavior by enhancing both appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental pursuit of CS. Cues paired with rewards can guide animals to valuable resources such as food. Cues can also promote dysfunctional reward-seeking behavior, as in overeating. Reward-paired cues influence reward seeking through two major mechanisms. First, reward-paired cues evoke conditioned anticipatory behaviors to prepare for impending rewards. Second, reward-paired cues are powerful motivators and they can evoke pursuit in their own right. Here we show that increasing neural activity in the basolateral amygdala enhances both conditioned anticipatory behaviors and pursuit of reward-paired cues. The basolateral amygdala therefore facilitates cue-induced control over behavior by both increasing anticipation of impending rewards and making reward cues more attractive.

Citing Articles

Triggered temptations: A new procedure to compare reward-seeking behaviour induced by discriminative and conditioned stimuli in rats.

LeCocq M, Najafipashaki S, Casale D, Laplante I, Samaha A Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025; .

PMID: 39994055 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06764-4.


Relapse after intermittent access to cocaine: Discriminative cues more effectively trigger drug seeking than do conditioned cues.

Ndiaye N, Shamleh S, Casale D, Castaneda-Ouellet S, Laplante I, Robinson M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 241(10):2015-2032.

PMID: 38767684 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06614-9.


Encoding and context-dependent control of reward consumption within the central nucleus of the amygdala.

Fraser K, Kim T, Castro M, Drieu C, Padovan-Hernandez Y, Chen B iScience. 2024; 27(5):109652.

PMID: 38650988 PMC: 11033178. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109652.


Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Connectivity to the Basolateral Amygdala Modulates Food Intake.

Ortiz-Guzman J, Swanson J, Tantry E, Kochukov M, Ung K, Addison A eNeuro. 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38383587 PMC: 10915460. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0369-23.2024.


Cue- versus reward-encoding basolateral amygdala projections to nucleus accumbens.

He Y, Huang Y, Schluter O, Dong Y Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37963179 PMC: 10645419. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89766.


References
1.
Flagel S, Akil H, Robinson T . Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology. 2008; 56 Suppl 1:139-48. PMC: 2635343. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.027. View

2.
Bernardi R, Ryabinin A, Berger S, Lattal K . Post-retrieval disruption of a cocaine conditioned place preference by systemic and intrabasolateral amygdala beta2- and alpha1-adrenergic antagonists. Learn Mem. 2009; 16(12):777-89. PMC: 2788211. DOI: 10.1101/lm.1648509. View

3.
Zhang F, Gradinaru V, Adamantidis A, Durand R, Airan R, De Lecea L . Optogenetic interrogation of neural circuits: technology for probing mammalian brain structures. Nat Protoc. 2010; 5(3):439-56. PMC: 4503465. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.226. View

4.
Tye K, Stuber G, de Ridder B, Bonci A, Janak P . Rapid strengthening of thalamo-amygdala synapses mediates cue-reward learning. Nature. 2008; 453(7199):1253-7. PMC: 2759353. DOI: 10.1038/nature06963. View

5.
Kane F, Coulombe D, Miliaressis E . Amygdaloid self-stimulation: a movable electrode mapping study. Behav Neurosci. 1991; 105(6):926-32. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.105.6.926. View