» Articles » PMID: 31950028

Comparative Genomic Analysis of : An Insight into Genomic Diversity and Genome Evolution

Overview
Journal Int J Genomics
Publisher Wiley
Date 2020 Jan 18
PMID 31950028
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

, a member of the genus, is a gram-positive pathogenic bacterium. possesses an open pan-genome that constitutes the basis of its high genomic diversity and allows for adaptation to specific niche conditions and the changing host environments. Our analysis further showed that the core genome of contributes to the pathogenicity and niche adaptation of . Comparative genomic analysis revealed that the genomes of shared identical collinearity relationship, and heterogeneity was mainly acquired by means of genomic islands and prophages. Moreover, genomic islands in were always involved in virulence, resistance, or niche adaptation and possibly working with prophages to cause the majority of genome expansion. These findings provide an insight into the genomic diversity, evolution, and structural variation of and a valuable resource for functional genomic studies.

Citing Articles

Comparative genomic analysis of species: deep insights into plant-growth-promoting and halotolerant capacities.

Jung H, Lee D, Lee S, Kong H, Park J, Seo Y Microb Genom. 2023; 9(10).

PMID: 37796250 PMC: 10634447. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001108.


Comparative genomic analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia unravels their genetic variations and versatility trait.

Xu Y, Cheng T, Rao Q, Zhang S, Ma Y J Appl Genet. 2023; 64(2):351-360.

PMID: 36892794 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-023-00752-0.


Genomic Characteristics Revealed Plasmid-Mediated Pathogenicity and Ubiquitous Rifamycin Resistance of .

Song Y, Xu X, Huang Z, Xiao Y, Yu K, Jiang M Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12:807610.

PMID: 35252029 PMC: 8891757. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.807610.


Responses to Ecopollutants and Pathogenization Risks of Saprotrophic Species.

Ivshina I, Kuyukina M, Krivoruchko A, Tyumina E Pathogens. 2021; 10(8).

PMID: 34451438 PMC: 8398200. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10080974.

References
1.
Takahashi N, Ohashi S, Sadykov M, Mizutani-Ui Y, Kobayashi I . IS-linked movement of a restriction-modification system. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e16554. PMC: 3031569. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016554. View

2.
Kita K, Kawakami H, Tanaka H . Evidence for horizontal transfer of the EcoT38I restriction-modification gene to chromosomal DNA by the P2 phage and diversity of defective P2 prophages in Escherichia coli TH38 strains. J Bacteriol. 2003; 185(7):2296-305. PMC: 151499. DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2296-2305.2003. View

3.
van der Geize R, Dijkhuizen L . Harnessing the catabolic diversity of rhodococci for environmental and biotechnological applications. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004; 7(3):255-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.001. View

4.
Ren Q, Chen K, Paulsen I . TransportDB: a comprehensive database resource for cytoplasmic membrane transport systems and outer membrane channels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 35(Database issue):D274-9. PMC: 1747178. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl925. View

5.
Pirog T, Sofilkanych A, Shevchuk T, Shulyakova M . Biosurfactants of Rhodococcus erythropolis IMV Ас-5017: synthesis intensification and practical application. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013; 170(4):880-94. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-013-0246-7. View