» Articles » PMID: 31947667

Are Environmental Interventions Targeting Skin Cancer Prevention Among Children and Adolescents Effective? A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jan 18
PMID 31947667
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Skin cancer, which is increasing exceedingly worldwide, is substantially preventable by reducing unprotected exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Several comprehensive interventions targeting sun protection behaviors among children and adolescents in various outdoor settings have been developed; however, there is a lack of insight on stand-alone effectiveness of environmental elements. To compose future skin cancer prevention interventions optimally, identification of effective environmental components is necessary. Hence, an extensive systematic literature search was conducted, using four scientific databases and one academic search engine. Seven relevant studies were evaluated based on stand-alone effects of various types of environmental sun safety interventions on socio-cognitive determinants, sun protection behaviors, UVR exposure, and incidence of sunburns and nevi. Free provision of sunscreen was most often the environmental component of interest, however showing inconsistent results in terms of effectiveness. Evidence regarding shade provision on shade-seeking behavior was most apparent. Even though more research is necessary to consolidate the findings, this review accentuates the promising role of environmental components in skin cancer prevention interventions and provides directions for future multi-component sun safety interventions targeted at children and adolescents in various outdoor settings.

Citing Articles

Preconception health policy, health promotion, and health services to achieve health in current and future generations: a narrative review.

Steel A, Strommer S, Adams J, Schoenaker D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):188.

PMID: 39979882 PMC: 11844041. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07176-0.


Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Actinic Keratosis. What is New for The Management for Sun-Damaged Skin.

Thamm J, Schuh S, Welzel J Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024; 14(3 S1).

PMID: 39133637 PMC: 11566825. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1403S1a146S.


Sun protection behaviors among children aged 6-18 years old, the role of socioeconomic factors: A cross-sectional study.

Nouri N, Iravani P, Abtahi-Naeini B Health Sci Rep. 2023; 6(11):e1727.

PMID: 38028698 PMC: 10663172. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1727.


Recurrence of digital papillary invasive adenocarcinoma.

Chaudhry N, Qureshi A, Shah R, Razzaq A, Clopton B, Genato R J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 2023(6):rjad296.

PMID: 37397064 PMC: 10307999. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad296.


Catching Cancer Early: The Importance of Dermato-Oncology Screening.

Statescu L, Cojocaru E, Trandafir L, Tarca E, Tirnovanu M, Heredea R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 37370677 PMC: 10296378. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123066.


References
1.
Sacchetto L, Zanetti R, Comber H, Bouchardy C, Brewster D, Broganelli P . Trends in incidence of thick, thin and in situ melanoma in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2018; 92:108-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.024. View

2.
Godar D . UV doses worldwide. Photochem Photobiol. 2005; 81(4):736-49. DOI: 10.1562/2004-09-07-ir-308r.1. View

3.
Whiteman D, Whiteman C, Green A . Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2001; 12(1):69-82. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008980919928. View

4.
Thomas B, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S . A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006; 1(3):176-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x. View

5.
Scherer R, Saldanha I . How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):264. PMC: 6836535. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0. View