» Articles » PMID: 31947542

QFR Predicts the Incidence of Long-Term Adverse Events in Patients with Suspected CAD: Feasibility and Reproducibility of the Method

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jan 18
PMID 31947542
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: We evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of post hoc quantitative flow ratio (QFR) measurements and their prognostic predictive power during long-term follow-up.

Methods And Results: Between 2010 and 2012, 167 patients without angiographic evidence of significant stenoses were enrolled in a prospective registry. Of these patients, 96% presented 7 years follow-up data. QFR was measured post hoc by three certified investigators. QFR analysis was feasible in 71% of left anterior descending (LAD), 72% of left circumflex (LCX), and 61% of right (RCA) coronaries for a total of 350 measurements repeated in triplicate. Coefficients of variation were 2.1% for RCA and LCX, and 2.8% for the LAD (quartile coefficients of dispersion respectively 1.5, 1.4, and 1.3). QFR ≤0.80 was recorded in 25 patients (27 vessels, in 74% of the cases LAD). A total of 86 major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were observed in 76 patients. QFR ≤0.80 in at least one of the three vessels was the strongest predictor of events (HR 3.14, 95%CI 1.78-5.54, p = 0.0001). This association was maintained in several sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: QFR reproducibility is acceptable, even when analysis is performed post hoc. A pathological QFR is not rare in patients without angiographic evidence of significant stenosis and is a predictor of incident events during long-term follow-up.

Condensed Abstract: In a post hoc analysis of 167 patients without evidence of angiographic significant stenosis, the presence of QFR value ≤0.80 in at least one of the three coronary vessels showed to be the strongest predictor of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during long-term follow-up. QFR reproducibility have been shown to be acceptable among experienced operators.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Role of Functional SYNTAX Score Based on Quantitative Flow Ratio.

Terentes-Printzios D, Gkini K, Oikonomou D, Gardikioti V, Aznaouridis K, Dima I Biomedicines. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39595005 PMC: 11592145. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112437.


The association between cardiac T2*BOLD and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in the diagnosis of stenotic coronary arteries in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Zhao L, Chen B, Tang H, Wang Y, Gu Z, An D Radiol Med. 2024; 129(8):1184-1196.

PMID: 38997567 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01847-2.


Prognostic Value of Post-PCI Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Terentes-Printzios D, Gkini K, Oikonomou D, Gardikioti V, Aznaouridis K, Dima I J Pers Med. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37623501 PMC: 10455379. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081251.


Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction.

Zhai C, Fan H, Zhu Y, Chen Y, Shen L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:934279.

PMID: 36082113 PMC: 9445206. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.934279.


Quantitative Flow Ratio or Angiography for the Assessment of Non-culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Protocol of the Randomized Trial QUOMODO.

Ullrich H, Olschewski M, Belhadj K, Munzel T, Gori T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:815434.

PMID: 35445090 PMC: 9013799. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.815434.


References
1.
Ciccarelli G, Barbato E, Toth G, Gahl B, Xaplanteris P, Fournier S . Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy. Circulation. 2017; 137(14):1475-1485. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782. View

2.
Erbay A, Steiner J, Lauten A, Landmesser U, Leistner D, Stahli B . Assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio in patients with small-vessel disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 96(4):743-751. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28531. View

3.
Koltowski L, Zaleska M, Maksym J, Tomaniak M, Solinski M, Puchta D . Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018; 107(9):858-867. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1258-7. View

4.
Tang J, Lai Y, Tu S, Chen F, Yao Y, Ye Z . Quantitative flow ratio-guided residual functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2019; 17(4):e287-e293. PMC: 9724850. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00369. View

5.
Watarai M, Otsuka M, Yazaki K, Inagaki Y, Kahata M, Kumagai A . Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(11):1963-1969. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01656-z. View