» Articles » PMID: 31947508

Cavity Ring-Down Methane Sensor for Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Jan 18
PMID 31947508
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present the development, integration, and testing of an open-path cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) methane sensor for deployment on small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS). The open-path configuration used here (without pump or flow-cell) enables a low mass (4 kg) and low power (12 W) instrument that can be readily integrated to sUAS, defined here as having all-up mass of <25 kg. The instrument uses a compact telecom style laser at 1651 nm (near-infrared) and a linear 2-mirror high-finesse cavity. We show test results of flying the sensor on a DJI Matrice 600 hexacopter sUAS. The high sensitivity of the CRDS method allows sensitive methane detection with a precision of ~10-30 ppb demonstrated for actual flight conditions. A controlled release setup, where known mass flows are delivered, was used to simulate point-source methane emissions. Examples of methane plume detection from flight tests suggest that isolated plumes from sources with a mass flow as low as ~0.005 g/s can be detected. The sUAS sensor should have utility for emissions monitoring and quantification from natural gas infrastructure. To the best of our knowledge, it is also the first CRDS sensor directly deployed onboard an sUAS.

Citing Articles

State of the Art and Future Perspectives of Atmospheric Chemical Sensing Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Marin D, Becciolini V, Santana L, Rossi G, Barbari M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(20).

PMID: 37896478 PMC: 10611377. DOI: 10.3390/s23208384.


Open-Path Laser Absorption Sensor for Mobile Measurements of Atmospheric Ammonia.

Shadman S, Miller T, Yalin A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(14).

PMID: 37514791 PMC: 10385541. DOI: 10.3390/s23146498.


Methods for quantifying methane emissions using unmanned aerial vehicles: a review.

Shaw J, Shah A, Yong H, Allen G Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021; 379(2210):20200450.

PMID: 34565219 PMC: 8473951. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0450.


Development of Drone-Mounted Multiple Sensing System with Advanced Mobility for In Situ Atmospheric Measurement: A Case Study Focusing on PM Local Distribution.

Madokoro H, Kiguchi O, Nagayoshi T, Chiba T, Inoue M, Chiyonobu S Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(14).

PMID: 34300619 PMC: 8309946. DOI: 10.3390/s21144881.

References
1.
McHale L, Martinez B, Miller T, Yalin A . Open-path cavity ring-down methane sensor for mobile monitoring of natural gas emissions. Opt Express. 2019; 27(14):20084-20097. DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.020084. View

2.
Nathan B, Golston L, OBrien A, Ross K, Harrison W, Tao L . Near-Field Characterization of Methane Emission Variability from a Compressor Station Using a Model Aircraft. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(13):7896-903. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00705. View

3.
Shah A, Pitt J, Kabbabe K, Allen G . Suitability of a Non-Dispersive Infrared Methane Sensor Package for Flux Quantification Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(21). PMC: 6864648. DOI: 10.3390/s19214705. View

4.
Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P . Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 363(1492):789-813. PMC: 2610110. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2184. View

5.
Brantley H, Thoma E, Squier W, Guven B, Lyon D . Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(24):14508-15. DOI: 10.1021/es503070q. View