» Articles » PMID: 31941469

Community Perspectives on Barriers and Challenges to HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Access by Men Who Have Sex with Men and Female Sex Workers Access in Nigeria

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Jan 17
PMID 31941469
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW) have critical needs for effective HIV prevention tools. This study identified perspectives of MSM, FSW and policy makers on the needs for, barriers to, and challenges with pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis (PrEP); and the logistics required to support roll-out of PrEP for MSM and FSW in Nigeria.

Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through a cross-sectional study. The quantitative data were collected through an online survey administered to 519 MSM, FSW and transgender respondents. The qualitative data were collected through 22 focus group discussions with 140 MSM and 80 FSW, and a two-day consultative workshop with 65 participants. Two open-ended questions in the online survey were also a source of qualitative data. Results of the quantitative data were reported descriptively; the qualitative data were inductively examined with a content analytic approach to construct descriptive categories. The findings from the quantitative and qualitative responses were triangulated.

Results: Four hundred and ninety-four (95.2%) online respondents had heard about PrEP through community dialogue (71.3%), and 439 (84.6%) supported its use by MSM and FSW. Fewer than half of the respondents were aware of the clinical care required for PrEP, and misconceptions about PrEP were common. Stated barriers to PrEP uptake were stigma, cost, frequency of HIV counseling and treatment services required, and possible drug-drug interactions. Concerns included possible condom migration, increased risk for sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy for FSW, and poor adherence to medication and hospital schedules. Participants felt that trained peer educators and HIV-test counselors could provide information and refer clients to clinics that provide PrEP. PrEP can be provided through peer-led facilities for MSM and FSW, though its access should be expanded to all persons who are at substantial risk for HIV to prevent negative labeling of PrEP. Public awareness about the use of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention is needed to prevent labeling of PrEP users as being HIV positive.

Conclusion: Although MSM and FSW are interested in the use of PrEP, numerous individual and structural barriers need to be addressed to facilitate access to it in Nigeria.

Citing Articles

Improving HIV Prevention for Key Populations in Nigeria: Insights on Access, Barriers, Stigma, and Service Utilization.

Emmanuel G, Sanni O, Roger A, Umoh P, Boniface O, Paul A Int J MCH AIDS. 2025; 14:e005.

PMID: 40046032 PMC: 11878721. DOI: 10.25259/IJMA_49_2024.


HIV incidence and adherence after pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation in key populations in Indonesia: Findings from a real-world pilot program 2021-2023.

Hanum N, Handayani M, Padmasawitri A, Zazuli Z, Anggadiredja K, Pohan M IJID Reg. 2025; 14:100573.

PMID: 39995503 PMC: 11848754. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100573.


Awareness, willingness, and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men in Ghana.

Apreku A, Guure C, Dery S, Yakubu A, Abu-Baare G, Addo S BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):213.

PMID: 39948458 PMC: 11827451. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-10614-1.


An Open Letter on Advancing HIV prevention: Augmenting an ecosystem-based approach to understand prevention decision-making.

Gantayat N, Baer J, Gangaramany A, Pierce-Messick R Gates Open Res. 2025; 8:73.

PMID: 39898111 PMC: 11785587. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.16067.2.


Attitudes toward scale-up of an Intensive Combination Approach to Rollback the Epidemic in Nigerian adolescents (iCARE) intervention for youth in Nigeria: results of a mixed methods early-implementation study.

Kozhumam A, Singh R, Agbaji O, Adetunji A, Taiwo B, Omigbodun O Implement Sci Commun. 2025; 6(1):6.

PMID: 39780298 PMC: 11707948. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00671-z.


References
1.
Haire B . Preexposure prophylaxis-related stigma: strategies to improve uptake and adherence - a narrative review. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2015; 7:241-9. PMC: 4610795. DOI: 10.2147/HIV.S72419. View

2.
Abraham B, Gulick R . Next-generation oral preexposure prophylaxis: beyond tenofovir. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012; 7(6):600-6. PMC: 3732461. DOI: 10.1097/COH.0b013e328358b9ce. View

3.
Ochonye B, Folayan M, Fatusi A, Bello B, Ajidagba B, Emmanuel G . Sexual practices, sexual behavior and HIV risk profile of key populations in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1210. PMC: 6721228. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7553-z. View

4.
Jespers V, Millwood I, Poynten I, Van Damme L, Kaldor J . The evolving design and methods for trials evaluating the safety of candidate vaginal microbicides: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis. 2013; 40(9):729-36. DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000431070.38601.03. View

5.
Makofane K, Gueboguo C, Lyons D, Sandfort T . Men who have sex with men inadequately addressed in African AIDS National Strategic Plans. Glob Public Health. 2012; 8(2):129-43. PMC: 3574221. DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2012.749503. View