» Articles » PMID: 31940712

Persistence of Denosumab Therapy Among Patients with Osteoporosis

Overview
Journal Asian Spine J
Date 2020 Jan 16
PMID 31940712
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective study in a single center.

Purpose: To examine denosumab persistence in patients of different ages with severe osteoporosis in Japan.

Overview Of Literature: Denosumab is an antibody drug used for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is mainly used in patients with severe osteoporosis who might have high motivation for treatment, and the need for only semi-annual subcutaneous injection might improve the continuation rate. However, no English-language articles have reported on denosumab persistence in the Japanese population, including young people, despite the importance of this issue in a super-aging society.

Methods: The subjects started treatment with subcutaneous denosumab in our department from July 2013 until December 2017. Persistence rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were defined as "persistent" or "non-persistent" according to the use of therapy after 60 months.

Results: The study included 101 patients (84 females) with a median follow-up period of 23.6±14.2 months. The persistence rate declined to 85.3%, 78.3%, 74.1%, 71.3%, and 69.3% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, respectively. Age at the initiation of denosumab therapy differed significantly between non-persistent (n=31) and persistent (n=70) patients (81.3 vs. 72.8 years, p <0.01). Persistence was significantly lower in patients aged ≥80 years than in those aged <60 and 60-79 years (both p <0.01). The reasons for non-persistence of denosumab therapy were transfer to another hospital (n=13), interruption of outpatient visits (n=11), dental treatment (n=4), adverse events (n=2), and patient request (n=1).

Conclusions: Persistence was significantly lower in patients aged ≥80 years than in patients of other ages, and strategies promoting persistence are needed for these elderly patients.

Citing Articles

Cost-consequence analysis of continuous denosumab therapy for osteoporosis treatment in South Korea.

Cha S, Sohn M, Yang H, Yeh E, Baek K, Ha J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):76.

PMID: 38245776 PMC: 10799461. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07185-8.


Economic evaluation of four treatment strategies for postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis and a recent fracture in mainland China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Tian L, Luo C, Li Y, Wang Q, Qu X, Yue C Arch Osteoporos. 2023; 18(1):100.

PMID: 37460858 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01309-8.


Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Denosumab Therapy: A Single Center Study.

Kobayashi K, Sato K, Ando T, Ando K, Imura S Asian Spine J. 2023; 17(5):842-850.

PMID: 37408487 PMC: 10622821. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2022.0417.


Comparison of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS).

Kang T, Park S, Lee S, Park J, Suh S J Korean Med Sci. 2022; 37(13):e68.

PMID: 35380023 PMC: 8980365. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e68.


Kidney Function Change and All-Cause Mortality in Denosumab Users with and without Chronic Kidney Disease.

Wu P, Lin M, Huang T, Lee T, Lin S, Chen C J Pers Med. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35207673 PMC: 8875658. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020185.


References
1.
Brown J, Prince R, Deal C, Recker R, Kiel D, de Gregorio L . Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 24(1):153-61. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010. View

2.
McClung M, Lewiecki E, Cohen S, Bolognese M, Woodson G, Moffett A . Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(8):821-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044459. View

3.
Carr A, Thompson P, Cooper C . Factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17(11):1638-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0166-2. View

4.
Kanis J, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J . European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(1):23-57. PMC: 3587294. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y. View

5.
Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J . Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:137. PMC: 3880492. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0137-0. View