» Articles » PMID: 31933868

Clinical Relevance of PET/CT in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2020 Jan 15
PMID 31933868
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Currently, the prognosis of standardized uptake value still has no consensus. We evaluated the role of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the MM lesions and the extramedullary disease (EMD) with the highest metabolic activity on PET/CT in predicting survival of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients.

Methods: A total of 123 previously untreated, newly diagnosed patients were enrolled in this study, who were diagnosed at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between September 2008 and February 2018. All patients with available PET/CT information at diagnosis were analyzed.

Results: We found that no clinical characteristics were significantly different between the pathological fracture groups. However, laboratory findings including elevated creatinine and anemia at diagnosis corresponded to osteolytic lesions at baseline PET/CT (elevated creatinine, P = 0.024; anemia, P = 0.025). Compared to SUV < 5.7 group, the proportion of patients with EMD was significantly high in the SUV ≥ 5.7 group (P = 0.046). Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model showed that age > 65, poor treatment response and EMD positive were independent poor prognostic factors for newly diagnosed MM patients.

Conclusion: We confirm the prognostic value of EMD, as detected by PET/CT, in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Therefore, the presence of EMD in newly diagnosed MM tends to be more important than the SUV.

Citing Articles

18F-FDG-PET/CT in relapsed multiple myeloma: Are prognostic thresholds different from first-line therapy?.

Zukovs R, Antke C, Mamlins E, Sawicki L, Mohring A, Lopez Y Niedenhoff D BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):63.

PMID: 35379187 PMC: 8981746. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00788-4.


The Value of Diffuse Splenic and Hepatic F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT in Diagnosing Patients with Anemia.

Deng L, Liu L, Ding H, Zhang S, Wang W, Zhang W Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022; 2022:3804673.

PMID: 35280709 PMC: 8890835. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3804673.


11C-acetate positron emission tomography is more precise than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating tumor burden and predicting disease risk of multiple myeloma.

Chen M, Zhu W, Du J, Yang C, Han B, Zhou D Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22188.

PMID: 34773054 PMC: 8590058. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01740-2.

References
1.
Narita T, Inagaki A, Kobayashi T, Kuroda Y, Fukushima T, Nezu M . t(14;16)-positive multiple myeloma shows negativity for CD56 expression and unfavorable outcome even in the era of novel drugs. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5:e285. PMC: 4349263. DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2015.6. View

2.
Lee S, Kim J, Jeon Y, Yoon J, Shin S, Eom K . Impact of extramedullary plasmacytomas on outcomes according to treatment approach in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2014; 94(3):445-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-014-2216-8. View

3.
Park S, Lee S, Chang W, Maeng C, Hong J, Choi M . Positive correlation between baseline PET or PET/CT findings and clinical parameters in multiple myeloma patients. Acta Haematol. 2013; 131(4):193-9. DOI: 10.1159/000354839. View

4.
Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller S, Beyer T . Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(21):4357-68. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.120. View

5.
Chantry A, Kazmi M, Barrington S, Goh V, Mulholland N, Streetly M . Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of patients with myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2017; 178(3):380-393. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14827. View