» Articles » PMID: 31932175

Evidence for Reducing Cancer-specific Mortality Due to Screening for Breast Cancer in Europe: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Eur J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Jan 15
PMID 31932175
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of organised mammography screening on breast cancer mortality across European regions. Therefore, a systematic review was performed including different types of studies from all European regions and stringently used clearly defined quality appraisal to summarise the best evidence.

Methods: Six databases were searched including Embase, Medline and Web of Science from inception to March 2018. To identify all eligible studies which assessed the effect of organised screening on breast cancer mortality, two reviewers independently applied predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Original studies in English with a minimum follow-up of five years that were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies were included. The Cochrane risk of bias instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias.

Results: Of the 5015 references initially retrieved, 60 were included in the final analysis. Those comprised 36 cohort studies, 17 case-control studies and 7 RCTs. None were from Eastern Europe. The quality of the included studies varied: Nineteen of these studies were of very good or good quality. Of those, the reduction in breast cancer mortality in attenders versus non-attenders ranged between 33% and 43% (Northern Europe), 43%-45% (Southern Europe) and 12%-58% (Western Europe). The estimates ranged between 4% and 31% in invited versus non-invited.

Conclusion: This systematic review provides evidence that organised screening reduces breast cancer mortality in all European regions where screening was implemented and monitored, while quantification is still lacking for Eastern Europe. The wide range of estimates indicates large differences in the evaluation designs between studies, rather than in the effectiveness of screening.

Citing Articles

Municipal breast and colorectal-anal cancer mortality in Sardinia, Italy from 2012 to 2020: application of a hierarchical Bayesian method.

Russo A, Belotti L, Gianicolo E BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e000855.

PMID: 40018603 PMC: 11816100. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000855.


Monitoring of prostate cancer screening in the European Union: development of key performance indicators through the PRAISE-U project.

Singh D, Carvalho A, Mosquera I, Vilaseca J, Patasius A, Miksiene G EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 80:103022.

PMID: 39927107 PMC: 11804572. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103022.


Change in Breast Cancer Screening Participation during COVID-19 Based on the 2019 and 2022 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions in Japan.

Kawamura C, Iwagami M, Komiyama J, Taniguchi Y, Sun Y, Masuda R JMA J. 2025; 8(1):183-190.

PMID: 39926056 PMC: 11799596. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0234.


Large Unstained Cells (LUC): A Novel Predictor of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Outcomes in HR+ HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Ceylan F, Mehdiyev M, Dede D, Efil S, Tenekeci A, Bilgin B J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797256 PMC: 11722146. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010173.


Clinical breast examination and its associated factors among reproductive age women in Ghana: multilevel logistic regression analysis.

Gebreegziabher Z, Semagn B, Walle A, Belay M, Wondie W, Degefaw G Front Oncol. 2025; 14():1413076.

PMID: 39777338 PMC: 11703916. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1413076.