» Articles » PMID: 31930213

Promoting Immunization Resiliency in the Digital Information Age

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 14
PMID 31930213
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The avalanche of online information on immunization is having a major impact on the percentage of the population who choose to get vaccinated. Vaccine misinformation spreads widely with the interactive Web 2.0 and social media; this can bury science-based information. A plethora of immunization misinformation online is affecting trust in health care professionals and in public immunization programs. There are no simple solutions to this, but seven evidence-based strategies can help. First, listen to patients' and parents' concerns, and demonstrate responsiveness by adopting best immunization practices, such as pain mitigation. Second, recognize and alert others to anti-immunization tactics, namely, conspiracy theories, fake experts, selectivity, demands that vaccines be 100% safe and effective, misrepresentation and false logic. Third, avoid unproductive debates with those who have strongly held views, both in person and when using social media. Be respectful, stick to your key message, identify where to find useful information and exit. Fourth, consider establishing an attractive, easily searchable online presence that reflects the complex art of persuasion. Emphasize the benefits of vaccine, use reader-friendly graphics and highlight facts with stories to strengthen your case. Fifth, work with social media platform providers, not to stifle freedom of expression, but to help ensure that misinformation is not favoured in searches. Sixth, promote curriculum development in the schools to improve students' understanding of the benefits and safety of immunization and to foster critical thinking skills. To do this, optimize the use of age-appropriate comics and interactive learning tools such as electronic games. Seventh, to shift the narrative in specific communities with low vaccination rates, work with community leaders to build tailored programs that foster trust and reflect local values.

Citing Articles

Dynamics of communication on measles vaccination on digital platforms in the Brazilian context: challenges and perspectives.

Silva M, Gattas V, Luna E Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2024; 66:e68.

PMID: 39699424 PMC: 11654139. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946202466068.


Factors related to parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for children: An exploratory factor analysis model.

Mohan R, Sindhuri R, Thandapani K, Devi D, Ganapathy K J Family Med Prim Care. 2023; 12(10):2428-2433.

PMID: 38074270 PMC: 10706543. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_816_23.


Exploring mechanisms of a web-based values-tailored childhood vaccine promotion intervention trial: Effects on parental vaccination values, attitudes, and intentions.

Kwan B, Pyrzanowski J, Sevick C, Wagner N, Resnicow K, Glanz J Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2021; 14(1):158-175.

PMID: 34396709 PMC: 9126060. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12296.


A public health timeline to prepare for COVID-19 vaccines in Canada.

MacDonald N, Comeau J, Dube E, Bucci L, Graham J Can J Public Health. 2020; 111(6):945-952.

PMID: 33151510 PMC: 7643523. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00423-1.


Addressing Parental Vaccine Hesitancy towards Childhood Vaccines in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review of Communication Interventions and Strategies.

Olson O, Berry C, Kumar N Vaccines (Basel). 2020; 8(4).

PMID: 33049956 PMC: 7712553. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040590.


References
1.
Meppelink C, Smit E, Fransen M, Diviani N . "I was Right about Vaccination": Confirmation Bias and Health Literacy in Online Health Information Seeking. J Health Commun. 2019; 24(2):129-140. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1583701. View

2.
MacDonald N . When science meets Google: Reflections on research and evidence in the age of science deniers. Clin Invest Med. 2018; 41:35-37. DOI: 10.25011/cim.v41i2.31440. View

3.
van der Linden S, Clarke C, Maibach E . Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:1207. PMC: 4669673. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4. View

4.
Gagneur A, Gosselin V, Dube E . Motivational interviewing: A promising tool to address vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine. 2018; 36(44):6553-6555. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.049. View

5.
Dube E, Bettinger J, Fisher W, Naus M, Mahmud S, Hilderman T . Vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and refusal in Canada: Challenges and potential approaches. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018; 42(12):246-251. PMC: 5757714. DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i12a02. View