» Articles » PMID: 31930063

Utilization of Echocardiography During Septic Shock Was Associated with a Decreased 28-day Mortality: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis of the MIMIC-III Database

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2020 Jan 14
PMID 31930063
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hemodynamic management is of paramount importance in patients with septic shock. Echocardiography has been increasingly used in assessing volume status and cardiac function. However, whether the utilization of echocardiography has an impact on prognosis is unknown. Thus, we intended to explore its effect on the outcomes of patients with septic shock.

Methods: The study was based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database. Septic shock patients were divided into two groups according to the usage of echocardiography during the onset of septic shock. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included the usage of inotropes, ventilation-free and norepinephrine-free time, and fluids input. Propensity-score matching was used to reduce the imbalance.

Results: Among 3,291 eligible patients, 1,289 patients who underwent echocardiography (Echo), and 1,289 who did not receive the Echo, had similar propensity scores and were included in the analyses. After matching, the Echo group had a significantly lower 28-day mortality (33.2% 37.7%, P=0.019). More patients in the Echo group received pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) (4.2% 0.2%, P<0.001) and inotropes (17.8% 7.1%, P<0.001). In the survival analysis, Echo utilization was associated with improved 28-day mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.95, P=0.005]. A reduced likelihood of 28-day mortality in patients with Echo those without Echo was maintained either when excluding patients receiving multiple echocardiography scans (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P=0.004) or when excluding patients undergoing PAC or pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; P=0.034).

Conclusions: Utilization of echocardiography was associated with improved 28-day outcomes in patients with septic shock.

Citing Articles

Levosimendan for sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: friend or foe?.

Du X, Xiong F, Hou Y, Yu X, Pan P Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 11():1520596.

PMID: 39844909 PMC: 11752121. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1520596.


Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.

Park C, Ku N, Park D, Park J, Ha T, Kim D Acute Crit Care. 2024; 39(4):445-472.

PMID: 39622601 PMC: 11617831. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920.


The association between integrating echocardiography use in the management of septic shock patients and outcomes in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Killu K, Patino-Sutton C, Kysh L, Castriotta R, Oropello J, Huerta L J Ultrasound. 2024; .

PMID: 39419883 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-024-00958-w.


Effectiveness of β-blockers in improving 28-day mortality in septic shock: insights from subgroup analysis and retrospective observational study.

Zhang L, Yu Y, Wu T, Pan T, Qu H, Wu J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1438798.

PMID: 39290214 PMC: 11405245. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1438798.


The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

Flower L, Waite A, Boulton A, Peck M, Akhtar W, Boyle A Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(10):1668-1680.

PMID: 39158704 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6.


References
1.
Phillips R, Hood S, Jacobson B, West M, Wan L, May C . Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) Accuracy and Efficacy Compared with Flow Probe and Transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): An Ovine Cardiac Output Validation. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012; 2012:621496. PMC: 3357512. DOI: 10.1155/2012/621496. View

2.
Zhang Z, Ni H, Qian Z . Effectiveness of treatment based on PiCCO parameters in critically ill patients with septic shock and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(3):444-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3638-4. View

3.
Levitov A, Frankel H, Blaivas M, Kirkpatrick A, Su E, Evans D . Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part II: Cardiac Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2016; 44(6):1206-27. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001847. View

4.
Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N, Deye N, Combes A, Barnoud D . Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290(20):2713-20. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.20.2713. View

5.
Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, Murphy D, Seymour C, Iwashyna T . Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014. JAMA. 2017; 318(13):1241-1249. PMC: 5710396. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836. View