» Articles » PMID: 31926400

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Margin-Positive (R1) Esophagectomy: A National Analysis

Overview
Journal J Surg Res
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Jan 12
PMID 31926400
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We performed a nationwide analysis to assess the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival after a microscopically margin-positive (R1) resection for esophageal cancer.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with R1 resection for esophageal cancer (2004-2015). Patients were grouped by type of adjuvant therapy. Patients who had other margin status, M1 disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, missing survival, and no or unknown treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. A 1:1 propensity score-matched sensitivity analysis was also performed comparing patients who received no adjuvant therapy with those who received adjuvant chemoradiation.

Results: Of 546 patients, 279 (51%) received adjuvant therapy and 267 (49%) did not. Patients receiving adjuvant therapy were more likely to be younger, have more advanced pathologic stage, have nonsquamous histology, and have shorter hospitalization. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and chemoradiation were all associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy. In a propensity score-matched analysis of 123 patient pairs, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy (adjusted HR: 0.30; 95% CI: [0.22, 0.40]).

Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy in patients with R1 resection for esophageal cancer even after adjustment for pathologic stage. Adjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with incompletely resected esophageal cancer in concordance with national guidelines.

Citing Articles

CBCT (Cone-Beam CT)-Based Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in the Post-operative Oesophageal Cancer Patient.

Ward A, Graham S, Almond E, Withers D Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70971.

PMID: 39507152 PMC: 11538859. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70971.


Adjuvant Nivolumab in Esophageal Cancer with Positive Resection Margins: A Premature Leap?.

Goense L, van Hillegersberg R Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(6):3567-3568.

PMID: 38457101 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15158-3.


Adjuvant Therapy for Patients with a Tumor-Positive Resection Margin After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy.

van der Zijden C, van der Sluis P, Mostert B, Nuyttens J, Spaander V, Valkema R Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(6):3813-3818.

PMID: 38245648 PMC: 11076321. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14912-x.

References
1.
Adelstein D, Rice T, Rybicki L, Saxton J, Videtic G, Murthy S . Mature results from a phase II trial of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for poor prognosis cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Thorac Oncol. 2009; 4(10):1264-9. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181b26f8e. View

2.
Gao S, Park H, Corso C, Rutter C, Kim A, Johung K . Role of Adjuvant Treatment in Esophageal Cancer With Incidental Pathologic Node Positivity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 104(1):267-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.092. View

3.
Dexter S, Sue-Ling H, McMahon M, Quirke P, Mapstone N, Martin I . Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Gut. 2001; 48(5):667-70. PMC: 1728263. DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.5.667. View

4.
Allum W, Stenning S, Bancewicz J, Clark P, Langley R . Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(30):5062-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2083. View

5.
Wu J, Chen Q, Teng L, Krasna M . Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 97(2):446-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.043. View