» Articles » PMID: 31925996

Application of the SCAI Classification in a Cohort of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Abstract

Background: The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) have recently proposed a new classification of cardiogenic shock (CS) dividing patients into five subgroups.

Objective: Aim of this study was to apply the SCAI classification to a cohort of patients presenting with CS and to evaluate its ability to predict 30-day survival.

Methods: SCAI CS subgroups were interpreted based on the recent consensus statement and then applied to N = 1,007 consecutive patients presenting with CS or large myocardial infarction (MI) between October 2009 and October 2017. The association between SCAI classification and 30-day all-cause mortality was assessed by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Mean age in the study cohort was 67 (±15) years, 72% were male. Mean lactate at baseline was 6.05 (±5.13) mmol/l and 51% of the patients had prior cardiac arrest. Overall survival probability was 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.5-54.0%). In view of the SCAI classification, the survival probability was 96.4% (95% CI 93.7-99.0%) in class A, 66.1% (95% CI 50.2-87.1%) in class B, 46.1% (95% CI 40.6-52.4%) in class C, 33.1% (95% CI 26.6-41.1%) in class D, and 22.6% (95% CI 17.1-30.0%) in class E. Higher SCAI classification was significantly associated with lower 30-day survival (p < .01).

Conclusion: In this large clinical cohort, the SCAI classification was significantly associated with 30-day survival. This finding supports the rationale of the SCAI CS classification and calls for a validation in a prospective trial.

Citing Articles

The Utility and Validation of SCAI-CSWG Stages in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

Rajan R, Al Jarallah M, Daoulah A, Panduranga P, Elmahrouk A, Mohamed Al Rawahi A J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025; 4(1):102461.

PMID: 40061415 PMC: 11887555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102461.


Validation of SCAI Shock Staging in Critically Ill Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Mukhtar O, Lal A, Jentzer J, Kashani K J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025; 15(1):13-21.

PMID: 39867142 PMC: 11759074. DOI: 10.55729/2000-9666.1436.


Describing and Classifying Shock: Recent Insights.

Long A, Yehya A, Stelling K, Baran D US Cardiol. 2024; 15:e15.

PMID: 39720494 PMC: 11664766. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.09.


Sex-specific outcomes in acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock treated with and without V-A ECMO: a retrospective German nationwide analysis from 2014 to 2018.

Beckmeyer H, Feld J, Koppe J, Faldum A, Droge P, Ruhnke T Heart Vessels. 2024; .

PMID: 39673619 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-024-02509-z.


Cardiogenic Shock Management and Research: Past, Present, and Future Outlook.

Ott S, Leser L, Lanmuller P, Just I, Leistner D, Potapov E US Cardiol. 2024; 16:e03.

PMID: 39600845 PMC: 11588188. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.25.