» Articles » PMID: 31921657

Biomarkers of Prognosis and Efficacy of Anti-angiogenic Therapy in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cancer

Abstract

In the last decades, the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has remarkably improved following the advent of the "targeted therapy" era. The expanding knowledge on the prominent role played by angiogenesis in RCC pathogenesis has led to approval of multiple anti-angiogenic agents such as sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, cabozantinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab. These agents can induce radiological responses and delay cancer progression for months or years before onset of resistance, with a clinically meaningful activity. The need for markers of prognosis and efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents has become more compelling as novel systemic immunotherapy agents have also been approved in RCC and can be administered as an alternative to angiogenesis inhibitors. Anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab has been approved in the second-line setting after tyrosine kinase inhibitors failure, while combination of nivolumab plus anti CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilimumab has been approved as first-line therapy of RCC patients at intermediate or poor prognosis. In this review article, biomarkers of prognosis and efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies are summarized with a focus on those that have the potential to affect treatment decision-making in RCC. Biomarkers predictive of toxicity of anti-angiogenic agents have also been discussed.

Citing Articles

A novel risk signature based on liquid-liquid phase separation-related genes reveals prognostic and tumour microenvironmental features in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Lu Q, Xi P, Xu S, Zhang Z, Gong B, Liu J Aging (Albany NY). 2024; 16(7):6118-6134.

PMID: 38546385 PMC: 11042959. DOI: 10.18632/aging.205691.


External validation of a red cell-based blood prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations.

Maffezzoli M, Santoni M, Mazzaschi G, Rodella S, Lai E, Maruzzo M Clin Exp Metastasis. 2024; 41(2):117-129.

PMID: 38363410 PMC: 10973030. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10266-6.


Tumor Suppressor Properties of Small C-Terminal Domain Phosphatases in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Krasnov G, Puzanov G, Dashinimaev E, Vishnyakova K, Kondratieva T, Chegodaev Y Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37629167 PMC: 10455398. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612986.


In vitro analysis of PI3K pathway activation genes for exploring novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in clear cell renal carcinoma.

Ali L, Raza A, Zaheer A, Alhomrani M, Alamri A, Alghamdi S Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(7):4851-4872.

PMID: 37560222 PMC: 10408522.


Spatial heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment influences the prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Zhang D, Ni Y, Wang Y, Feng J, Zhuang N, Li J J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):489.

PMID: 37474942 PMC: 10360235. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04336-8.


References
1.
Schmidinger M, Vogl U, Bojic M, Lamm W, Heinzl H, Haitel A . Hypothyroidism in patients with renal cell carcinoma: blessing or curse?. Cancer. 2010; 117(3):534-44. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25422. View

2.
Cavaliere C, DAniello C, Della Pepa C, Pisconti S, Berretta M, Facchini G . Current and Emerging Treatments for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2017; 18(5):468-479. DOI: 10.2174/1568009617666170209094030. View

3.
Bracarda S, Bamias A, Casper J, Negrier S, Sella A, Staehler M . Is Axitinib Still a Valid Option for mRCC in the Second-Line Setting? Prognostic Factor Analyses From the AXIS Trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019; 17(3):e689-e703. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.03.017. View

4.
Samaan S, Khella H, Girgis A, Scorilas A, Lianidou E, Gabril M . miR-210 is a prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Mol Diagn. 2015; 17(2):136-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.10.005. View

5.
Verbiest A, Renders I, Caruso S, Couchy G, Job S, Laenen A . Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Molecular Characterization of IMDC Risk Groups and Sarcomatoid Tumors. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019; 17(5):e981-e994. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.009. View