» Articles » PMID: 31917833

Neighborhood Disparities in the Availability, Advertising, Promotion, and Youth Appeal of Little Cigars and Cigarillos, United States, 2015

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Jan 10
PMID 31917833
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Between 2012 and 2016, sales of cigars increased by 29% in the United States. In small local studies, greater little cigar and cigarillo (LCC) availability and marketing has been documented in neighborhoods with a greater proportion of Hispanic or Latino and black residents, and near schools. This national study of cigarette retailers assesses whether LCC availability and marketing at the point of sale is associated with neighborhood racial, ethnic, income, and percent youth demographics.

Methods: In 2015, we collected LCC availability and marketing data through retailer audits of a nationally representative sample of 2128 cigarette retailers. Using 2011-2015 American Community Survey census tract estimates, we modeled associations of neighborhood demographics (in quartiles) with availability of LCC-flavored products, and presence of exterior advertisements, youth marketing, and promotions.

Results: Nearly 90% of retailers sold LCCs, 83.0% sold flavored LCCs, and 30.9% had youth marketing. Controlling for retailer type and other neighborhood characteristics, neighborhoods with the highest proportion of black residents had significantly higher odds of flavored LCC availability (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52, 3.30); exterior advertisements (AOR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.94, 4.16); price promotions (AOR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.07-2.45), and youth appeal (AOR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.08) compared to the lowest. Disparities in flavored LCC availability, exterior advertising, and youth appeal were also present for lower income neighborhoods.

Conclusion: Neighborhoods with a greater proportion of black or lower income residents have greater flavored LCCs availability and LCC marketing. Without stronger LCC regulation, residents of these neighborhoods may be at a greater risk of LCC use.

Implications: LCCs are harmful combustible tobacco products that are less regulated than cigarettes (eg, lower taxation, cheaper outlay due to small package sizes, availability of flavors), which makes them an affordable and appealing product to youth. This study documents greater availability, advertising, and marketing of LCCs in neighborhoods with a higher proportion of black or lower-income residents, potentially putting these populations at a greater risk of using or switching to these products in the face of increasing cigarette regulations. These findings underscore the need for local, state, and federal LCC regulatory action.

Citing Articles

Impact of warning pictorials and size on perceived effectiveness of cigar warning labels in a nationally representative between-subjects experiment.

Goldstein A, Yang M, Jarman K, Queen T, Clark S, Ranney L BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088482.

PMID: 39819948 PMC: 11752031. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088482.


Protecting historically marginalized groups or targeted marketing? A computational analysis of individuals engaging with public and protected cigar-branded tweets.

Wu J, Ranker L, Origgi J, Ma J, Hao D, Benjamin E Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024; 266:112516.

PMID: 39689499 PMC: 11844820. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112516.


Visual attention and recall of flavored cigarillo package elements among young adults: A randomized control trial.

Pike Moore S, Ennis A, Kirihara S, Gomez E, Reyes-Klein M, Sharp H PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(11):e0003840.

PMID: 39602397 PMC: 11602028. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003840.


Blunt Talk on "Blunts": The Increasingly Popular Tobacco Product That Is Potentially Exacerbating Tobacco-Related Health Disparities.

Sanchez J, Fong R, Hampilos K, Cooper Z, Middlekauff H J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 40(2):443-447.

PMID: 39313669 PMC: 11802957. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08980-8.


Neighborhood Inequities in Tobacco Product Descriptors, Washington, DC, 2018-2019.

Kong A, Westneat S, Anesetti-Rothermel A, van de Venne J, Debnam C, Ribisl K Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 26(Supplement_2):S73-S81.

PMID: 38817025 PMC: 11140226. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad226.


References
1.
Ringel J, Wasserman J, Andreyeva T . Effects of public policy on adolescents' cigar use: evidence from the National Youth Tobacco Survey. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(6):995-8. PMC: 1449297. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.030411. View

2.
Corey C, Holder-Hayes E, Nguyen A, Delnevo C, Rostron B, Bansal-Travers M . US Adult Cigar Smoking Patterns, Purchasing Behaviors, and Reasons for Use According to Cigar Type: Findings From the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013-2014. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017; 20(12):1457-1466. PMC: 6236070. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx209. View

3.
Smiley S, Kintz N, Rodriguez Y, Barahona R, Sussman S, Cruz T . Disparities in retail marketing for little cigars and cigarillos in Los Angeles, California. Addict Behav Rep. 2019; 9:100149. PMC: 6542377. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100149. View

4.
Chen-Sankey J, Choi K, Kirchner T, Feldman R, Butler 3rd J, Mead E . Flavored cigar smoking among African American young adult dual users: An ecological momentary assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 196:79-85. PMC: 6377319. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.020. View

5.
Viola A, Giovenco D, Miller Lo E, Delnevo C . A cigar by any other name would taste as sweet. Tob Control. 2015; 25(5):605-6. PMC: 5267507. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052518. View