» Articles » PMID: 31916034

Evaluation of a Novel Dog Animal Model for Peri-implant Disease: Clinical, Radiographic, Microbiological and Histological Assessment

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Jan 10
PMID 31916034
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess longitudinal peri-implant tissue evaluation in a plaque compromised ligature free dog model, clinically, radiographically, microbiologically and histologically.

Materials And Methods: Six beagle mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted. Plaque accumulated for 16 weeks. Two implants were placed per hemi-mandible. For 17 weeks, control implants (CI) in one hemi-mandible were brushed daily; test implants (TI) in the other were not. These parameters were then assessed: clinically, probing depth (PD), bleeding-on-probing (BOP), presence of plaque (PP) and clinical attachment level (CAL); radiographically, marginal bone level; microbiologically, counts for Streptococcus spp., Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia and total bacterial load. At week 17, histomorphometric analysis was performed (MM-ISH (mucosal margin-implant shoulder); ISH-fBIC (implant shoulder-first bone-to-implant contact); MM-aJE (mucosal margin-apical area junctional epithelium); MM-aINF (mucosal margin-apical limit of the inflammatory infiltrate); %INF (percentage of inflammatory infiltrate)).

Results: At week 17, TI had significant increased PD, BOP, PP and CAL versus baseline. All clinical variables presented intergroup differences. There was no intergroup difference for radiographic bone loss (p > 0.05). Total bacteria, Fusobacterium spp., A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis had intergroup differences. There was no statistically significant intergroup difference for ISH-fBIC.

Conclusions: Longitudinal microbiology evaluation detected a shift period. Final intergroup microbiological differences were the basis of W17 clinical intergroup differences, with higher values in TI. Microbiological and clinical changes detected in peri-implant tissues were compatible with onset of peri-implant disease. Despite histological inflammatory intergroup difference, no histological or radiographic intergroup bone loss was detected.

Clinical Relevance: This study set-up describes a valuable method for generating "true" early peri-implant defects without mechanical trauma.

Citing Articles

Experimental models for peri-implant diseases: a narrative review.

Yin D, Zhan S, Liu Y, Yan L, Shi B, Wang X Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(7):378.

PMID: 38884808 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05755-7.


A Standardized Rat Model to Study Peri-implantitis of Transmucosal Osseointegrated Implants.

Liu X, Deng S, Li X, Liu H, Li Z, Wu Y Biomater Res. 2024; 28:0021.

PMID: 38828365 PMC: 11142924. DOI: 10.34133/bmr.0021.


Evaluation of Implant Stability According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Cohort Study.

Shim J, Kim M, An S, Kang E, Choi Y J Clin Med. 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37568490 PMC: 10419881. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155087.


Influence of Section Thickness on the Accuracy and Specificity of Histometric Parameters Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy in a Canine Model of Experimental Peri-Implantitis-A Proof of Concept.

Boldeanu L, Popa-Wagner A, Boariu M, Stratul S, Rusu D, Vela O J Clin Med. 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37048546 PMC: 10095515. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072462.


Histomorphometrical and CBCT Evaluation of Tissue Loss Progression Induced by Consecutive, Alternate Ligatures in Experimental Peri-Implantitis in a Dog Model: A Pilot Study.

Boldeanu L, Boariu M, Rusu D, Vaduva A, Roman A, Surlin P J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36294510 PMC: 9605274. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206188.