» Articles » PMID: 31915032

Unpacking the Complexities of De-implementing Inappropriate Health Interventions

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Jan 10
PMID 31915032
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

De-implementing inappropriate health interventions is essential for minimizing patient harm, maximizing efficient use of resources, and improving population health. Research on de-implementation has expanded in recent years as it cuts across types of interventions, patient populations, health conditions, and delivery settings. This commentary explores unique aspects of de-implementing inappropriate interventions that differentiate it from implementing evidence-based interventions, including multi-level factors, types of action, strategies for de-implementation, outcomes, and unintended negative consequences. We highlight opportunities to continue to advance research on the de-implementation of inappropriate interventions in health care and public health.

Citing Articles

Trends in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Mastectomy Among Patients With Limited Nodal Burden.

Wang T, Jones T, Thomas S, van den Bruele A, Rosenberger L, Chiba A JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2459692.

PMID: 39946126 PMC: 11826356. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59692.


Barriers to dental providers' use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management following tooth extractions.

Mitchell S, Gryczynski J, Worley D, Asche S, Truitt A, Rindal D Implement Res Pract. 2025; 6:26334895251319810.

PMID: 39931509 PMC: 11808763. DOI: 10.1177/26334895251319810.


The Challenges Associated with : Barriers to Implementing Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions in ABA Settings.

Pickard K, Islam N, Green N, Chatson E, Kuhn J, Yosick R Behav Anal Pract. 2025; 17(4):1074-1088.

PMID: 39790909 PMC: 11707165. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-024-01011-2.


Development and usability testing of a multifaceted intervention to reduce low-value injury care.

Berube M, Lapierre A, Sykes M, Grimshaw J, Turgeon A, Lauzier F BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):37.

PMID: 39773251 PMC: 11706146. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12153-y.


Assessing health technology implementation during academic research and early-stage development: support tools for awareness and guidance: a review.

Roosink M, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Verdaasdonk R, Kelders S Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1386998.

PMID: 39469424 PMC: 11513387. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1386998.


References
1.
Frakes M, Gruber J . Defensive Medicine: Evidence from Military Immunity. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2019; 11(3):197-231. PMC: 6800742. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20180167. View

2.
Morgan D, Dhruva S, Coon E, Wright S, Korenstein D . 2018 Update on Medical Overuse. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 179(2):240-246. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5748. View

3.
Preacher K, Zyphur M, Zhang Z . A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(3):209-33. DOI: 10.1037/a0020141. View

4.
Cook R, Sackett D . The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ. 1995; 310(6977):452-4. PMC: 2548824. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452. View

5.
Ortashi O, Virdee J, Hassan R, Mutrynowski T, Abu-Zidan F . The practice of defensive medicine among hospital doctors in the United Kingdom. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:42. PMC: 3874772. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-42. View