» Articles » PMID: 31910849

Delay in Decision and Determinants for Safe Abortion Among Women at Health Facilities in South West Ethiopia: Facility Based Cross Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Jan 9
PMID 31910849
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Delayed safe abortion is the most common cause of gynecologic admission in developing countries. The study, therefore, assessed the delay decision for safe abortion and determinant factors among women at health facilities in South West Ethiopia.

Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 women who were selected from health facilities by using simple random sampling. A pre-tested structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were entered into Epidata and exported to SPSS for analysis. Binary Logistic regression was used and Variables with P-value < 0.25 during bivariate analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression model. Finally, variables with p-value ≤0.05 were judged as a statistically significant association.

Results: The magnitude of delay decision for safe abortion services was 70.8% (0.66, 075). Place of residence [AOR 2.44 (95% C.I: (1.39, 4.30)], lack of formal education [AOR: 2.41 (95% C.I:(1.08, 3.59)], level of education [AOR: 2.22 (95% C.I: (1.19, 4.11)], history of previous abortion [AOR: 3.47 (95% C.I: (1.74, 8.6.91)] and late confirmation of pregnancy [AOR: 1.64 (95% C.I: (1.01-2.65)] were the determinant factors for delay in decision for safe abortion.

Conclusion: This study revealed that the majority of women were delayed for the decision of safe abortion services. Place of residence of the women, lack of formal education, history of previous abortion and late confirmation of pregnancy were the determinant factors for women's decision for safe abortion. Therefore, it is better to work on awareness creation the timing of safe abortion and complication of delay abortion especially for the women from rural area.

Citing Articles

Magnitude of late presentation for induced abortion care services and the associated factors among reproductive-age women at selected hospitals in the South Gondar district of Northwest Ethiopia in 2023: a multicentred, cross-sectional study.

Dagnaw E, Berta M, Cherkos E, Mequannent E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e081946.

PMID: 39572098 PMC: 11580306. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081946.


Delays in seeking abortion and its determinants among reproductive-age women based on the Ethiopian Demographic and health survey.

Gebeyehu A, Dessie A, Anely D, Zemene M, Negesse Y, Desalegn W Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38477.

PMID: 39430523 PMC: 11489464. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38477.


Magnitude of second-trimester-induced abortion and associated factors among women who received abortion service at public hospitals of Arba Minch and Wolayita Sodo towns, southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Abebe M, Mersha A, Degefa N, Molla W, Wudneh A Front Glob Womens Health. 2022; 3:969310.

PMID: 36312870 PMC: 9614144. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.969310.


Determinants of induced abortion among women received maternal health care services in public hospitals of Arba Minch and Wolayita Sodo town, southern Ethiopia: unmatched case-control study.

Abebe M, Mersha A, Degefa N, Gebremeskel F, Kefelew E, Molla W BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1):107.

PMID: 35397584 PMC: 8994190. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01695-0.


Factors Associated with Abortion Complications after the Implementation of a Surveillance Network (MUSA Network) in a University Hospital.

Cavalari C, Veiga-Junior N, Kajiura B, Eugeni C, Tavares B, Baccaro L Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021; 43(7):507-512.

PMID: 34461660 PMC: 10303421. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735129.

References
1.
Bonnen K, Tuijje D, Rasch V . Determinants of first and second trimester induced abortion - results from a cross-sectional study taken place 7 years after abortion law revisions in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 14:416. PMC: 4307197. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-014-0416-9. View

2.
Ingham R, Lee E, Clements S, Stone N . Reasons for second trimester abortions in England and Wales. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16(31 Suppl):18-29. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31375-5. View

3.
Rehnstrom Loi U, Lindgren M, Faxelid E, Oguttu M, Klingberg-Allvin M . Decision-making preceding induced abortion: a qualitative study of women's experiences in Kisumu, Kenya. Reprod Health. 2018; 15(1):166. PMC: 6171301. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0612-6. View

4.
Calvert C, Owolabi O, Yeung F, Pittrof R, Ganatra B, Tuncalp O . The magnitude and severity of abortion-related morbidity in settings with limited access to abortion services: a systematic review and meta-regression. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(3):e000692. PMC: 6035513. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000692. View

5.
Likwa R, Biddlecom A, Ball H . Unsafe abortion in Zambia. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2010; (3):1-4. View