» Articles » PMID: 31908381

Simple Electronic Portal Imager-Based Pretreatment Quality Assurance Using Acuros XB: A Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal J Med Phys
Date 2020 Jan 8
PMID 31908381
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study demonstrates a novel electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based forward dosimetry approach for pretreatment quality assurance aided by a treatment planning system (TPS).

Materials And Methods: Dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were delivered in EPID and fluence was captured on a beam-by-beam basis (F). An open field having dimensions equal to those of the largest IMRT field was used in the TPS to obtain the transmitted fluence. This represented the patient-specific heterogeneity correction (F). To obtain the resultant heterogeneity-corrected fluence, EPID measured fluence was corrected for the TPS generated heterogeneity (F = F × F). Next, the calculated fluence per beam basis was collected from TPS (F). Finally, F and F were compared using a 3% percentage dose difference (% DD)-3 mm distance to agreement [DTA] gamma analysis in an isocentric plane (two-dimensional [2D]) and multiple planes (quasi three-dimensional [3D]) orthogonal to the beam axis.

Results: The 2D heterogeneity-corrected dose reconstruction revealed a mean γ passing of the pelvis, thorax, and head-and-neck cases of 96.3% ±2.0%, 96.3% ±1.8%, and 96.1% ±2.2%, respectively. Quasi-3D γ passing for the pelvis, thorax, and head-and-neck cases were 97.5% ±1.4%, 96.3% ±2.4%, and 97.5% ±1.0%, respectively.

Conclusion: EPID dosimetry produced an inferior result due to no heterogeneity corrections for sites such as the lung and esophagus. Incorporating TPS-based heterogeneity correction improved the EPID dosimetry result for those sites with large heterogeneity.

Citing Articles

Dosimetric Validation of Treatment Planning System for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.b.

Prasath S, Ramesh Babu P Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(5):1715-1723.

PMID: 38809644 PMC: 11318820. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.5.1715.


Determination of Multileaf Collimator Positional Errors as a Function of Dose Rate, Speed, and Delivery Interruption for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Delivery.

Roy S, Sarkar B, Pradhan A J Med Phys. 2022; 46(4):286-294.

PMID: 35261498 PMC: 8853456. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_18_21.

References
1.
Storchi P, Woudstra E . Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data. Phys Med Biol. 1996; 41(4):637-56. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/4/005. View

2.
Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Rozendaal R, van Oers R, Mijnheer B, Mans A . Virtual patient 3D dose reconstruction using in air EPID measurements and a back-projection algorithm for IMRT and VMAT treatments. Phys Med. 2017; 37:49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.04.016. View

3.
Manikandan A, Sarkar B, Nandy M, Sureka C, Gossman M, Sujatha N . Detector system dose verification comparisons for arc therapy: couch vs. gantry mount. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(3):4495. PMC: 5711059. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4495. View

4.
Siebers J, Kim J, Ko L, Keall P, Mohan R . Monte Carlo computation of dosimetric amorphous silicon electronic portal images. Med Phys. 2004; 31(7):2135-46. DOI: 10.1118/1.1764392. View

5.
Louwe R, Damen E, van Herk M, Minken A, Torzsok O, Mijnheer B . Three-dimensional dose reconstruction of breast cancer treatment using portal imaging. Med Phys. 2003; 30(9):2376-89. DOI: 10.1118/1.1589496. View