» Articles » PMID: 31907723

Population Structure of Indigenous Southern African Goats Based on the Illumina Goat50K SNP Panel

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Jan 8
PMID 31907723
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, the genetic structure of indigenous Tswana and Swazi goats using the Illumina Goat50K SNP array was investigated. Two South African commercial goat breeds were included to investigate admixture with the indigenous populations in southern Africa. A total of 144 DNA samples including Boer goats (n = 24), Kalahari Red (n = 24), Swazi (n = 48), and Tswana goats (n = 48) were genotyped. Statistical analysis was performed using PLINK version 1.07. Genetic diversity, measured as expected heterozygosity, was estimated at 0.390, 0.398, 0.413, and 0.387 for Boer, Kalahari Red, Tswana, and Swazi goats, respectively. The individual inbreeding coefficient varied from 0.019 ± 0.05 to 0.011 ± 0.06 for the Tswana and Swazi goats, respectively. The Principal component analysis clustered the populations according to geographical origin and breed type. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) for shorter intervals (0-10 kb) ranged from 0.44 to 0.56 and commercial breeds had higher values. Effective population sizes decreased with generations and at the 13th generation ranged between 87 for Boer to 266 for Tswana goats. The Tswana population exhibited the highest level of genetic variation and effective population size, which holds potential for improved production in marginal regions. A national strategy is required to maintain genetic diversity in communal goat production systems through well-structured breeding and conservation programs.

Citing Articles

Genome-Wide Patterns of Homozygosity and Heterozygosity and Candidate Genes in Greek Insular and Mainland Native Goats.

Tsartsianidou V, Otapasidis A, Papakostas S, Karaiskou N, Vouraki S, Triantafyllidis A Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39858574 PMC: 11765163. DOI: 10.3390/genes16010027.


Contribution of an Asian-prevalent HLA haplotype to the risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Kawamura A, Matsuda K, Murakami Y, Saruta M, Kohno T, Shiraishi K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12944.

PMID: 37558689 PMC: 10412552. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40000-3.


Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Conservation in South African Indigenous Goat Ecotypes: A Review.

Magoro A, Mtileni B, Hadebe K, Zwane A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(23).

PMID: 36496874 PMC: 9735466. DOI: 10.3390/ani12233353.


Genomic Tools for the Characterization of Local Animal Genetic Resources: Application in Goat.

Tolone M, Sardina M, Senczuk G, Chessari G, Criscione A, Moscarelli A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(20).

PMID: 36290231 PMC: 9597745. DOI: 10.3390/ani12202840.


Meta-Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA Control Region Diversity to Shed Light on Phylogenetic Relationship and Demographic History of African Sheep () Breeds.

Wanjala G, Bagi Z, Kusza S Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(8).

PMID: 34439994 PMC: 8389696. DOI: 10.3390/biology10080762.


References
1.
Alexander D, Novembre J, Lange K . Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009; 19(9):1655-64. PMC: 2752134. DOI: 10.1101/gr.094052.109. View

2.
Barbato M, Orozco-terWengel P, Tapio M, Bruford M . SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front Genet. 2015; 6:109. PMC: 4367434. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00109. View

3.
Brito L, McEwan J, Miller S, Pickering N, Bain W, Dodds K . Genetic diversity of a New Zealand multi-breed sheep population and composite breeds' history revealed by a high-density SNP chip. BMC Genet. 2017; 18(1):25. PMC: 5348757. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0492-8. View

4.
Corbin L, Liu A, Bishop S, Woolliams J . Estimation of historical effective population size using linkage disequilibria with marker data. J Anim Breed Genet. 2012; 129(4):257-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.01003.x. View

5.
Goddard M, Hayes B . Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(6):381-91. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2575. View