» Articles » PMID: 31906551

In Vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties and Smear Layer Removal/Sealer Penetration of a Novel Silver-Citrate Root Canal Irrigant

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jan 8
PMID 31906551
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a novel silver-citrate root canal irrigation solution (BioAKT) on smear layer removal, sealer penetration after root canal instrumentation and antibacterial activity. Single-root teeth were endodontically treated, sealed with an epoxi-amine resin sealer and irrigated using: Group I: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); Group II: silver-citrate solution (BioAKT); Group III: phosphate buffer solution (PBS); Group IV: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Smear layer removal and silver deposition at the coronal, middle and apical portion of each canal were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules at coronal, middle and apical portion was assessed through dye-assisted confocal microscopy (CSM). Both SEM and CSM micrographs were evaluated by two examiners (κ = 0.86), who were blind to the irrigation regimens; scores were given according to the degree of penetration of the sealer. Data analysis included Pearson's and Sidak's multiple comparisons. Dentin discs were polished and sterilized. biofilms were grown using a continuous-flow bioreactor under anaerobic conditions for 72 h. Specimens were irrigated with the tested solutions, and bacterial viability was assessed using a tetrazolium salt assay (MTT). Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA and Student's post-hoc t-test (p < 0.05). BioAKT and EDTA were the most efficient solutions both in removing the smear layer and allowing sealer penetration. However, at the apical portion BioAKT performed significantly better compared to EDTA both in smear layer removal and sealer penetration (p < 0.05). BioAKT and NaOCl showed comparable antibacterial effect (p = 0.53). In conclusion, BioAKT represents a suitable smear layer removal agent, which allows for reliable sealer penetration at the apical portion of the root canal system and offers significant antibacterial properties.

Citing Articles

Effect of Final Irrigation Solutions on Mechanical Properties of Root Canal Dentine Running title: Final Irrigation on Mechanical Properties.

Ratih D, Widyastuti A, Monika A Eur Endod J. 2024; 9(4):405-410.

PMID: 38949478 PMC: 11685522. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2024.63308.


Evaluation of cytotoxicity of 3.8 % SDF and BioAKT solutions on the viability of dental pulp stem cells.

Maru V, Ismail B M, Langaliya A, Karthikeyan B, Habiba S J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024; 14(1):86-91.

PMID: 38293570 PMC: 10825334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.001.


Biocides with Controlled Degradation for Environmentally Friendly and Cost-Effective Fecal Sludge Management.

Loiko N, Kanunnikov O, Tereshkina K, Pankratov T, Belova S, Botchkova E Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36671737 PMC: 9855048. DOI: 10.3390/biology12010045.


The Effect of a Novel Silver-Citrate Root Canal Irrigation Solution (BioAkt), Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA), and Citric Acid on the Microhardness of Root Canal Dentin: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Alyahya A, Rekab M, Al-Ostwani A, Abdo A, Kayed K Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31255.

PMID: 36505159 PMC: 9731556. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31255.


Evaluation of Effects of Various Irrigating Solutions on Chemical Structure of Root Canal Dentin Using FTIR, SEM, and EDS: An In Vitro Study.

Padmakumar I, Hinduja D, Mujeeb A, Kachenahalli Narasimhaiah R, Kumar Saraswathi A, Mirza M J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13(4).

PMID: 36278666 PMC: 9590088. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13040197.


References
1.
Zehnder M, Schmidlin P, Sener B, Waltimo T . Chelation in root canal therapy reconsidered. J Endod. 2005; 31(11):817-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000158233.59316.fe. View

2.
Yamada R, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin P . A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part 3. J Endod. 1983; 9(4):137-42. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80032-6. View

3.
Kara Tuncer A, Unal B . Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation. J Endod. 2014; 40(5):613-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.017. View

4.
Torabinejad M, Cho Y, Khademi A, Bakland L, Shabahang S . The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. J Endod. 2003; 29(4):233-9. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200304000-00001. View

5.
Pascon F, Kantovitz K, Sacramento P, Nobre-Dos-Santos M, Puppin-Rontani R . Effect of sodium hypochlorite on dentine mechanical properties. A review. J Dent. 2009; 37(12):903-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.004. View