» Articles » PMID: 31905907

Salivary Microbiome and Cigarette Smoking: A First of Its Kind Investigation in Jordan

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jan 8
PMID 31905907
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is accumulating evidence in the biomedical literature suggesting the role of smoking in increasing the risk of oral diseases including some oral cancers. Smoking alters microbial attributes of the oral cavity by decreasing the commensal microbial population and increasing the pathogenic microbes. This study aims to investigate the shift in the salivary microbiota between smokers and non-smokers in Jordan. Our methods relied on high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) experiments for V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene, followed by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis including advanced multidimensional data visualization methods and statistical analysis approaches. Six genera-, , , , , and -predominated the salivary microbiota of all samples with different percentages suggesting the possibility for the salivary microbiome to restored after quitting smoking. Three genera-, , and -showed significantly elevated levels among smokers at the expense of in non-smokers. In conclusion, smoking has a definite impact on shifting the salivary microbiota in smokers. We can suggest that there is microbial signature at the genera level that can be used to classify smokers and non-smokers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) based on the salivary abundance of genera. Proteomics and metabolomics studies are highly recommended to fully understand the effect of bacterial endotoxin release and xenobiotic metabolism on the bacterial interrelationships in the salivary microbiome and how they affect the growth of each other in the saliva of smokers.

Citing Articles

The impact of interactions between heavy metals and smoking exposures on the formation of oral microbial communities.

Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Li J, Pei S, Liu J, Feng L Front Microbiol. 2025; 15:1502812.

PMID: 39744392 PMC: 11688307. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1502812.


A pilot study on oral microbiome in electronic cigarettes consumers versus traditional cigarettes smokers.

Liu J, Yue Q, Zhang S, Xu J, Jiang X, Su Q Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2024; 70(1):147-158.

PMID: 38954243 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-024-01185-w.


Exploratory analysis on the association of dietary live microbe and non-dietary prebiotic/probiotic intake with serum cotinine levels in the general adult population.

Lin S, Zhu N, Zhu Y, Mao H, Zhang S Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1405539.

PMID: 38863585 PMC: 11165358. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1405539.


Smoking induced salivary microbiome dysbiosis and is correlated with lipid biomarkers.

Mohammed L, Razali R, Zakaria Z, Benslimane F, Cyprian F, Al-Asmakh M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):608.

PMID: 38796419 PMC: 11127352. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04340-4.


Bacteriome and mycobiome dysbiosis in oral mucosal dysplasia and oral cancer.

Belibasakis G, Seneviratne C, Jayasinghe R, Vo P, Bostanci N, Choi Y Periodontol 2000. 2024; 96(1):95-111.

PMID: 38501658 PMC: 11579824. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12558.


References
1.
Morris A, Beck J, Schloss P, Campbell T, Crothers K, Curtis J . Comparison of the respiratory microbiome in healthy nonsmokers and smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 187(10):1067-75. PMC: 3734620. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1913OC. View

2.
Kato I, Vasquez A, Moyerbrailean G, Land S, Sun J, Lin H . Oral microbiome and history of smoking and colorectal cancer. J Epidemiol Res. 2017; 2(2):92-101. PMC: 5241083. DOI: 10.5430/jer.v2n2p92. View

3.
Saha S, Bhalla D, Whayne Jr T, Gairola C . Cigarette smoke and adverse health effects: An overview of research trends and future needs. Int J Angiol. 2012; 16(3):77-83. PMC: 2733016. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1278254. View

4.
Littman D, Pamer E . Role of the commensal microbiota in normal and pathogenic host immune responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2011; 10(4):311-23. PMC: 3202012. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.004. View

5.
Davis J, Youssef N, Elshahed M . Assessment of the diversity, abundance, and ecological distribution of members of candidate division SR1 reveals a high level of phylogenetic diversity but limited morphotypic diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(12):4139-48. PMC: 2698373. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00137-09. View