» Articles » PMID: 31905090

Effects of Dopaminergic Drugs on Cognitive Control Processes Vary by Genotype

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Jan 7
PMID 31905090
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dopamine (DA) has been implicated in modulating multiple cognitive control processes, including the robust maintenance of task sets and memoranda in the face of distractors (cognitive stability) and, conversely, the ability to switch task sets or update the contents of working memory when it is advantageous to do so (cognitive flexibility). In humans, the limited specificity of available pharmacological probes has posed a challenge for understanding the mechanisms by which DA, acting on multiple receptor families across the PFC and striatum, differentially influences these cognitive processes. Using a within-subject, placebo-controlled design, we contrasted the impact of two mechanistically distinct DA drugs, tolcapone (an inhibitor of catechol--methyltransferase [COMT], a catecholamine inactivator) and bromocriptine (a DA agonist with preferential affinity for the D2 receptor), on the maintenance and switching of task rules. Given previous work demonstrating that drug effects on behavior are dependent on baseline DA tone, participants were stratified according to genetic polymorphisms associated with cortical (COMT Val158Met) and striatal (Taq1A) DA system function. Our results were partially consistent with an inverted-U-shaped relationship between tolcapone and robust rule maintenance (interaction with COMT genotype) and between bromocriptine and cued rule switching (interaction with Taq1A genotype). However, when task instructions were ambiguous, a third relationship emerged to explain drug effects on spontaneous task switching (interaction of COMT genotype and bromocriptine). Together, this pattern of results suggests that the effects of DA drugs vary not only as a function of the DA system component upon which they act but also on subtle differences in task demands and context.

Citing Articles

A dopaminergic basis of behavioral control.

Ballard I, Furman D, Berry A, White 3rd R, Jagust W, Kayser A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345422 PMC: 11429830. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.17.613524.


Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.

Egner T Nat Rev Psychol. 2024; 2(11):702-714.

PMID: 39301103 PMC: 11409542. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4.


Contextual control demands determine whether stability and flexibility trade off against each other.

Geddert R, Egner T Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(7):2529-2551.

PMID: 39251567 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02955-x.


Striatal dopamine synthesis and cognitive flexibility differ between hormonal contraceptive users and nonusers.

Taylor C, Furman D, Berry A, White 3rd R, Jagust W, DEsposito M Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(13):8485-8495.

PMID: 37160338 PMC: 10321119. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad134.


Genetic profile for dopamine signaling predicts brain functional reactivity to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Hong H, Kim R, Song Y, Suh C, Lee H, Lyoo I Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022; 273(1):99-111.

PMID: 35951113 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01436-2.