» Articles » PMID: 31903422

Exploring the Use of a General Equilibrium Method to Assess the Value of a Malaria Vaccine: An Application to Ghana

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jan 7
PMID 31903422
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Malaria is an important health and economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Conventional economic evaluations typically consider only direct costs to the health care system and government budgets. This paper quantifies the potential impact of malaria vaccination on the wider economy, using Ghana as an example. We used a computable general equilibrium model of the Ghanaian economy to estimate the macroeconomic impact of malaria vaccination in children under the age of 5, with a vaccine efficacy of 50% against clinical malaria and 20% against malaria mortality. The model considered changes in demography and labor productivity, and projected gross domestic product (GDP) over a time frame of 30 years. Vaccine coverage ranging from 20% to 100% was compared with a baseline with no vaccination. Malaria vaccination with 100% coverage was projected to increase the GDP of Ghana over 30 years by US$6.93 billion (in 2015 prices) above the baseline without vaccination, equivalent to an increase in annual GDP growth of 0.5%. Projected GDP per capita would increase in the first year due to immediate reductions in time lost from work by adults caring for children with malaria, then decrease for several years as reductions in child mortality increase the number of dependent children, then show a sustained increase after Year 11 due to long-term productivity improvements in adults resulting from fewer malaria episodes in childhood. Investing in improving childhood health by vaccinating against malaria could result in substantial long-term macroeconomic benefits when these children enter the workforce as adults. These macroeconomic benefits are not captured by conventional economic evaluations and constitute an important potential benefit of vaccination.

Citing Articles

The Macroeconomic Impact of Increasing Investments in Malaria Control in 26 High Malaria Burden Countries: An Application of the Updated EPIC Model.

Patouillard E, Han S, Lauer J, Barschkett M, Arcand J Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024; 12:7132.

PMID: 38618809 PMC: 10590221. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7132.


Macroeconomic impact of Ebola outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa and potential mitigation of GDP loss with prophylactic Ebola vaccination programs.

Morrison L, Anderson B, Brower A, Talbird S, Buell N, MacDonald P PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283721.

PMID: 37040383 PMC: 10089322. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283721.


Malaria control and elimination in Kenya: economy-wide benefits and regional disparities.

Elnour Z, Grethe H, Siddig K, Munga S Malar J. 2023; 22(1):117.

PMID: 37029370 PMC: 10080938. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04505-6.


Partially different? The importance of general equilibrium in health economic evaluations: An application to nocturia.

Hafner M, Yerushalmi E, Andersson F, Burtea T Health Econ. 2022; 32(3):654-674.

PMID: 36424887 PMC: 10100343. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4638.


Incorporating human dynamic populations in models of infectious disease transmission: a systematic review.

Mogelmose S, Neels K, Hens N BMC Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1):862.

PMID: 36401210 PMC: 9673416. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07842-0.


References
1.
Asante K, Abdulla S, Agnandji S, Lyimo J, Vekemans J, Soulanoudjingar S . Safety and efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine given with expanded-programme-on-immunisation vaccines: 19 month follow-up of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011; 11(10):741-9. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70100-1. View

2.
Jit M, Hutubessy R . Methodological Challenges to Economic Evaluations of Vaccines: Is a Common Approach Still Possible?. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016; 14(3):245-52. PMC: 4871927. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0224-7. View

3.
Winskill P, Walker P, Griffin J, Ghani A . Modelling the cost-effectiveness of introducing the RTS,S malaria vaccine relative to scaling up other malaria interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2017; 2(1):e000090. PMC: 5321383. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000090. View

4.
Sauboin C, Van Bellinghen L, Van de Velde N, Van Vlaenderen I . Economic Impact of Introducing the RTS,S Malaria Vaccine: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis in 41 Countries. MDM Policy Pract. 2019; 4(2):2381468319873324. PMC: 6906355. DOI: 10.1177/2381468319873324. View

5.
Penny M, Verity R, Bever C, Sauboin C, Galactionova K, Flasche S . Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine: a systematic comparison of predictions from four mathematical models. Lancet. 2015; 387(10016):367-375. PMC: 4723722. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00725-4. View