» Articles » PMID: 31903358

Does Mesh Cage Subsidence Have Any Effect on Functional Outcome in Spinal Tuberculosis?

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Jan 7
PMID 31903358
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Occurrence of mesh cage subsidence in patients undergoing anterior column reconstruction following Tuberculosis spine is frequent radiological finding as bone quality of affected vertebrae is poor. This study aims at determining effect of mesh cage subsidence on functional outcome.

Methods: Retrospective demographics of 30 patients of consecutive series in age range 4-60 year were collected with Clinical outcome evaluation using VAS, ODI and ASIA scale. 30 patient having Dorsolumbar tuberculosis with vertebral involvement ranging from 1-6 with mean vertebral level involvement of 2.71, underwent anterior column reconstruction through posterior only approach between 2011-15 were reviewed. Patients were followed at regular intervals of 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months & thereafter on yearly basis. They were evaluated for interbody height loss with subsidence, fusion & segmental angle.

Results: Clinical parameters i.e. VAS & ODI showed improvement in postoperative period which continued to remain same even after subsidence ( < 0.05). Subsidence was categorized as combined anterior + posterior < 5mm; 5 -10mm; >10mm. ODI at follow up was 8.5 ±4.62, 9 ± 2 and 9 ± 4.2 ( = 0.961) respectively & VAS score in above group was 1.3 ± 0.51, 1.5 ± 1.2 & 1.5 ± 0.7 ( = 0.975) respectively. Subsidence was age, spinal level nonspecific.

Conclusion: Study indicates that though Cage subsidence occurs to varying severity due to weakened vertebral bodies, it did not have significant impact on functional outcome in terms of VAS, ODI or radiological evidence of fusion following reconstruction in Spinal tuberculosis.

Citing Articles

Single-Stage Combined Anterior Corpectomy and Posterior Instrumented Fusion in Tuberculous Spondylitis With Varying Degrees of Neurological Deficit.

Debnath U, McConnell J, Kumar S Int J Spine Surg. 2021; 15(3):600-611.

PMID: 33985996 PMC: 8176832. DOI: 10.14444/8081.

References
1.
Tuli S . Results of treatment of spinal tuberculosis by "middle-path" regime. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975; 57(1):13-23. View

2.
Yin X, Liu S, Li J, Chen Y, Hu X, Zeng K . The role of costotransverse radical debridement, fusion and postural drainage in the surgical treatment of multisegmental thoracic spinal tuberculosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2015; 25(4):1047-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4283-5. View

3.
Hodgson A, Stock F . The Classic: Anterior spinal fusion: a preliminary communication on the radical treatment of Pott's disease and Pott's paraplegia. 1956. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 444:10-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000203456.67016.b7. View

4.
de Ruiter G, Lobatto D, Wolfs J, Peul W, Arts M . Reconstruction with expandable cages after single- and multilevel corpectomies for spinal metastases: a prospective case series of 60 patients. Spine J. 2014; 14(9):2085-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.029. View

5.
Chang C, Merritt K . Infection at the site of implanted materials with and without preadhered bacteria. J Orthop Res. 1994; 12(4):526-31. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100120409. View