» Articles » PMID: 31903242

Use of New Cannulated Screws for Primary Sternal Closure in High Risk Patients for Sternal Dehiscence

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2020 Jan 7
PMID 31903242
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Median sternotomy is still the approach of choice for heart surgery and the most common sternal closure is conventional six-wire technique. Mediastinitis is the frightening complication of the median sternotomy and occurs from 1% up to 2.4% of cases with a mortality rate which ranges from 14% up to 47%. Many methods have been suggested to reinforce the sternum with the common goal to improve sternal stability and prevent mediastinitis, but there is not consensus among cardiac surgeons on the optimal way to close the sternum. For this reason, we report our experience with a sternal device that, although not entirely new as a concept, has new technical features and plays a new role in preventing sternal dehiscence, according to the most recent findings on mechanism which leads to sternal dehiscence.

Methods: We enrolled 62 high risk patients for sternal dehiscence (patients with 2 well established historical risk factors), and we closed the sternum of the patients with a new surgical option consisting of passing, in a conventional six-wire sternal closure, the last sixth steel wire (Ø 1.0 mm, n° 5) through a couple of titanium cannulated screws (Ø 5.5 mm, self-tap-ping with a length from 10 to 16 mm and 2-mm increments) inserted into the 5th or 6th couple of rib cartilages.

Results: Primary chest closure with cannulated screws was performed on 48 males and 14 females. The average age of patients was 67.6 years (range, 43-88 years). The average follow-up was 12.8±16.2 months (range, 1-41 months). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the most common preoperative risk factor. The average number of risk factors was 2.4 (range, 2-4). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the most common cardiac procedure. There were no peri-operative deaths. BMI >30 Kg/m and diabetes were the associated of risk factors predisposing to superficial skin dehiscence.

Conclusions: In our clinical experience with high risk patients, this surgical option suggests that there is evidence of an effective stabilization of standard sternal closure and this option seems a promising technique to prevent the domino effect which starts from the xifoid bone and proceeds to the manubrium with the effect of leading to sternal instability which is the first step to mediastinitis.

Citing Articles

Sternal fixation and autologous bone grafting for post sternotomy non-union: a case series.

Jhala H, McFarlane P, Avtaar Singh S, Deep K, Mahmood Z, Doshi H J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(7):4685-4692.

PMID: 39144351 PMC: 11320236. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-126.


Efficacy of Primary Closure Technique in Treatment of Post-Sternotomy Mediastinitis in Paediatric Group: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fadaly A, Abdellatif G, Saeed S, Brik A, Elsharawy M, Deebis A Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:7929-7939.

PMID: 36317099 PMC: 9617555. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S388446.


The Development of an Automatic Rib Sequence Labeling System on Axial Computed Tomography Images with 3-Dimensional Region Growing.

Seol Y, Park S, Kim Y, Park Y, Lee H, Kim K Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(12).

PMID: 35746310 PMC: 9230858. DOI: 10.3390/s22124530.


Review of Biomechanical Studies and Finite Element Modeling of Sternal Closure Using Bio-Active Adhesives.

Al-Abassi A, Papini M, Towler M Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(5).

PMID: 35621476 PMC: 9138150. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9050198.


Comparison of Two Sternal Closure Techniques Based on Risk Factors: A Prospective, Observational Study.

Duzgun A, Ilkeli E, Katircioglu F Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021; 2021:2169431.

PMID: 34659454 PMC: 8519673. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2169431.

References
1.
Negri A, Manfredi J, Terrini A, Rodella G, Bisleri G, El Quarra S . Prospective evaluation of a new sternal closure method with thermoreactive clips. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 22(4):571-5. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00411-6. View

2.
Cohen D, Griffin L . A biomechanical comparison of three sternotomy closure techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73(2):563-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03389-6. View

3.
Glennie S, E T Shepherd D, Jutley R . Strength of wired sternotomy closures: effect of number of wire twists. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007; 2(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1016/S1569-9293(02)00068-3. View

4.
Dasika U, Trumble D, Magovern J . Lower sternal reinforcement improves the stability of sternal closure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75(5):1618-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04988-3. View

5.
LeVeen H, PICCONE V . Nylon-band chest closure. Arch Surg. 1968; 96(1):36-9. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1968.01330190038009. View