» Articles » PMID: 31902991

Long-term Analysis of an Unconventional Way of Doing Double-head Pterygium Excision

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 Jan 7
PMID 31902991
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study is to describe an unconventional technique of vertically split conjunctival autograft (CAG) for primary double-head pterygium and its long-term outcome.

Materials And Methods: This was a retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series of 95 eyes of 95 patients, who underwent vertical, split CAG surgery without maintaining limbus-limbus orientation for primary double-head pterygium from January 2013 to January 2017. All patients were reviewed for recurrence in their follow-up period.

Results: The mean follow-up was 14.12 ± 9.42 months. The baseline characteristics included 44 males and 51 females, with a mean age of 56.24 ± 10.03 years. The only significant complication was recurrence rate of 2.10% (2 eyes out of 95). The most common secondary outcome was graft edema (36.84%, 35 eyes out of 95), which resolved without any intervention. The other outcomes such as graft retraction (12.63%), Tenon's granuloma (1.05%), and subconjunctival hemorrhage (34.73%) were also recorded.

Conclusion: Unconventional vertical split CAG without maintaining limbus-limbus orientation has convincing results in treating double-head pterygium with lower recurrence rate.

Citing Articles

Management of pterygium: our experience and a simplified treatment algorithm.

Kodavoor S, Joseph A, Ramamurthy S, Dandapani R Rom J Ophthalmol. 2024; 68(2):108-113.

PMID: 39006329 PMC: 11238865. DOI: 10.22336/rjo.2024.21.


Profile of complications in pterygium surgery - A retrospective analysis.

Kodavoor S, Preethi V, Dandapani R Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(7):1697-1701.

PMID: 34146009 PMC: 8374796. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3055_20.


Efficacy of second donor conjunctival graft from the same site for pterygium - A retrospective analysis.

Kodavoor S, Preethi V, Dandapani R Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(3):559-562.

PMID: 33595472 PMC: 7942126. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_824_20.


Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis.

Kodavoor S, Soundarya B, Dandapani R Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020; 69(1):66-68.

PMID: 33323576 PMC: 7926105. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_235_20.

References
1.
Allan B, Short P, Crawford G, Barrett G, Constable I . Pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting: an effective and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77(11):698-701. PMC: 504627. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.77.11.698. View

2.
Mutlu F, Sobaci G, Tatar T, Yildirim E . A comparative study of recurrent pterygium surgery: limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation versus mitomycin C with conjunctival flap. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106(4):817-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90172-0. View

3.
Dolezalova V . Is the occurrence of a temporal pterygium really so rare?. Ophthalmologica. 1977; 174(2):88-91. DOI: 10.1159/000308583. View

4.
Vrabec M, Weisenthal R, Elsing S . Subconjunctival fibrosis after conjunctival autograft. Cornea. 1993; 12(2):181-3. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199303000-00016. View

5.
Maloof A, Ho A, Coroneo M . Influence of corneal shape on limbal light focusing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35(5):2592-8. View