» Articles » PMID: 3190223

Enumeration of Anaerobic Bacterial Microflora of the Equine Gastrointestinal Tract

Overview
Date 1988 Sep 1
PMID 3190223
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Samples from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, as well as from the cecum and colon, were obtained from 11 mature grass-fed horses. Viable counts of total culturable and proteolytic bacteria were made on habitat-simulating media containing 40% clarified ruminal fluid. The mean pHs in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 6.32, 7.10, and 7.47, respectively; the mean pH decreased to 6.7 in the hindgut. The acetate concentration increased along the length of the small intestine and was the only volatile fatty acid present in this gut segment. Molar proportions of acetate, propionate, and butyrate in the hindgut were 85:10:3. Differences in bacterial counts on habitat-simulating media containing equine cecal fluid or clarified ruminal fluid were negligible. Bacterial counts showed a substantial population in the duodenum (ca. 2.9 x 10(6) per g [wet weight] of sample), and this increased to 29.0 x 10(6) in the jejunum and 38.4 x 10(6) in the ileum. Proteolytic bacteria formed a high proportion of the total culturable bacteria, especially in duodenal samples. Counts of proteolytic bacteria per gram (wet weight) of sample were 3.0 x 10(6), 15.6 x 10(6), and 22.0 x 10(6) in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, respectively. There was a close relationship between lumenal and mucosal bacterial counts, although actual values were lower in mucosal samples. The mucosal bacterial population in the duodenum was high relative to the lumenal population. Although the comparison of bacterial populations in the hindgut of the horse and white rhino was limited to a single animal, the results were of interest. Counts were higher in the cecum than in the colon for both the horse and the white rhino.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Stability of Gastric Fluid and Fecal Microbial Populations in Healthy Horses under Pasture and Stable Conditions.

Bishop R, Kemper A, Clark L, Wilkins P, McCoy A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39457909 PMC: 11503871. DOI: 10.3390/ani14202979.


.

Kara K, Altinsoy A Vet Med Sci. 2024; 10(2):e31373.

PMID: 38369823 PMC: 10875320. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.1373.


Effects of concentrate levels on intestinal fermentation and the microbial profile in Japanese draft horses.

Yano R, Moriyama T, Fujimori M, Nishida T, Hanada M, Fukuma N J Equine Sci. 2024; 34(4):101-109.

PMID: 38274554 PMC: 10806360. DOI: 10.1294/jes.34.101.


Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens.

Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36557769 PMC: 9783266. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10122517.


The Role of Yeast in Supporting Gut Health in Horses: An Updated Review on Its Effects on Digestibility and Intestinal and Fecal Microbiota.

Perricone V, Sandrini S, Irshad N, Comi M, Lecchi C, Savoini G Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(24).

PMID: 36552396 PMC: 9774806. DOI: 10.3390/ani12243475.


References
1.
CZERKAWSKI J . The use of pivalic acid as a reference substance in measurements of production of volatile fatty acids by rumen micro-organisms in vitro. Br J Nutr. 1976; 36(2):311-5. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19760085. View

2.
White N . What's next in equine colic research?. Equine Vet J. 1986; 18(6):429-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1986.tb03678.x. View

3.
Alexander F, Davies M . Production and fermentation of lactate by bacteria in the alimentary canal of the horse and pig. J Comp Pathol. 1963; 73:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0368-1742(63)80001-6. View

4.
Savage D . Microorganisms associated with epithelial surfaces and stability of the indigenous gastrointestinal microflora. Nahrung. 1987; 31(5-6):383-95. DOI: 10.1002/food.19870310511. View

5.
CHANEY A, MARBACH E . Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962; 8:130-2. View