» Articles » PMID: 31900181

Is Aggregated Synthetic Amorphous Silica Toxicologically Relevant?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2020 Jan 5
PMID 31900181
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The regulatory definition(s) of nanomaterials (NMs) frequently uses the term 'agglomerates and aggregates' (AA) despite the paucity of evidence that AA are significantly relevant from a nanotoxicological perspective. This knowledge gap greatly affects the safety assessment and regulation of NMs, such as synthetic amorphous silica (SAS). SAS is used in a large panel of industrial applications. They are primarily produced as nano-sized particles (1-100 nm in diameter) and considered safe as they form large aggregates (> 100 nm) during the production process. So far, it is indeed believed that large aggregates represent a weaker hazard compared to their nano counterpart. Thus, we assessed the impact of SAS aggregation on in vitro cytotoxicity/biological activity to address the toxicological relevance of aggregates of different sizes.

Results: We used a precipitated SAS dispersed by different methods, generating 4 ad-hoc suspensions with different aggregate size distributions. Their effect on cell metabolic activity, cell viability, epithelial barrier integrity, total glutathione content and, IL-8 and IL-6 secretion were investigated after 24 h exposure in human bronchial epithelial (HBE), colon epithelial (Caco2) and monocytic cells (THP-1). We observed that the de-aggregated suspension (DE-AGGR), predominantly composed of nano-sized aggregates, induced stronger effects in all the cell lines than the aggregated suspension (AGGR). We then compared DE-AGGR with 2 suspensions fractionated from AGGR: the precipitated fraction (PREC) and the supernatant fraction (SuperN). Very large aggregates in PREC were found to be the least cytotoxic/biologically active compared to other suspensions. SuperN, which contains aggregates larger in size (> 100 nm) than in DE-AGGR but smaller than PREC, exhibited similar activity as DE-AGGR.

Conclusion: Overall, aggregation resulted in reduced toxicological activity of SAS. However, when comparing aggregates of different sizes, it appeared that aggregates > 100 nm were not necessarily less cytotoxic than their nano-sized counterparts. This study suggests that aggregates of SAS are toxicologically relevant for the definition of NMs.

Citing Articles

Humanising nanotoxicology: replacement of animal-derived products in the application of integrated approaches to testing and assessment of nanomaterial inhalation hazard.

Fraser R, Campbell K, Pokorski P, MacKinnon E, McAllister K, Neves K Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1526808.

PMID: 40013306 PMC: 11861073. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1526808.


Insect farming: A bioeconomy-based opportunity to revalorize plastic wastes.

Sanchez-Hernandez J, Megharaj M Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2025; 23:100521.

PMID: 39867963 PMC: 11758129. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100521.


Unveiling the toxicity of micro-nanoplastics: A systematic exploration of understanding environmental and health implications.

Shukla S, Khanna S, Khanna K Toxicol Rep. 2025; 14():101844.

PMID: 39811819 PMC: 11730953. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101844.


About the Transient Effects of Synthetic Amorphous Silica: An In Vitro Study on Macrophages.

Torres A, Collin-Faure V, Fenel D, Sergent J, Rabilloud T Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1).

PMID: 36613664 PMC: 9820141. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010220.


Pulmonary Toxicity of Silica Linked to Its Micro- or Nanometric Particle Size and Crystal Structure: A Review.

Marques Da Silva V, Benjdir M, Montagne P, Pairon J, Lanone S, Andujar P Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(14).

PMID: 35889616 PMC: 9318389. DOI: 10.3390/nano12142392.


References
1.
van Kesteren P, Cubadda F, Bouwmeester H, van Eijkeren J, Dekkers S, de Jong W . Novel insights into the risk assessment of the nanomaterial synthetic amorphous silica, additive E551, in food. Nanotoxicology. 2014; 9(4):442-52. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.940408. View

2.
He Y, Park K . Effects of the Microparticle Shape on Cellular Uptake. Mol Pharm. 2016; 13(7):2164-71. PMC: 5315697. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00992. View

3.
Murugadoss S, Lison D, Godderis L, van den Brule S, Mast J, Brassinne F . Toxicology of silica nanoparticles: an update. Arch Toxicol. 2017; 91(9):2967-3010. PMC: 5562771. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-017-1993-y. View

4.
Rahman Q, Lohani M, Dopp E, Pemsel H, Jonas L, Weiss D . Evidence that ultrafine titanium dioxide induces micronuclei and apoptosis in Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110(8):797-800. PMC: 1240951. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110797. View

5.
Younes M, Aggett P, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, Dusemund B, Filipic M . Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2020; 16(1):e05088. PMC: 7009582. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088. View