» Articles » PMID: 31899094

Psychosocial Factors Affecting Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 4
PMID 31899094
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are considered successful surgeries to treat a variety of painful shoulder conditions. Although implant survivorship for both is good to excellent in the long term, a variety of factors-clinical, technical, and psychosocial-may affect patient-reported outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed systematically using keywords "shoulder arthroplasty outcomes," "psychosocial factors shoulder," "shoulder replacement outcomes," "depression shoulder arthroplasty," "satisfaction shoulder arthroplasty," "factors shoulder replacement," "expectations shoulder arthroplasty," and "predictors shoulder arthroplasty." Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and analyzed. Type of surgery performed, sample size, outcome measures, and other factors influencing patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six reviewed mental health disorders as predictors of postoperative outcome after shoulder arthroplasty. Of these, 4 found that disorders such a depression and anxiety were associated with increased risk of perioperative complications and lower final functional outcome scores. Two studies evaluated workers' compensation status as a possible predictor of outcomes and found that patients with claims had lower satisfaction and outcome scores at final follow-up compared with those without claims. Two studies showed that preoperative opioid use was associated with lower outcome scores and overall satisfaction rate after shoulder arthroplasty. Three studies showed that higher patient confidence and preoperative expectations were correlated with better outcomes.

Conclusion: Our review shows that psychosocial factors may play just as important role in affecting patient outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty as technical factors.

Citing Articles

Association of neighborhood level socioeconomic status and patient reported clinical improvement following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Morgan C, Firoved A, Denard P, Griffin J JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):175-180.

PMID: 39898202 PMC: 11784469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.205.


Patient-related prognostic factors for function and pain after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Hesseling B, Prinsze N, Jamaludin F, Perry S, Eygendaal D, Mathijssen N Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):286.

PMID: 39578927 PMC: 11583791. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02694-y.


Which patient level factors predict persistent pain after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?.

Brune D, George S, Edwards R, Moroder P, Scheibel M, Lazaridou A J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):786.

PMID: 39578842 PMC: 11585229. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05285-8.


Effects of pre-operative patient expectations on the outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Claes A, De Mesel A, Verborgt O, Struyf F Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241282021.

PMID: 39545011 PMC: 11559730. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241282021.


Response to 'Does primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures show favourable functional outcomes over secondary treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty?'.

Spek R, Ring D, van den Bekerom M Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(5):569-570.

PMID: 39493404 PMC: 11528730. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231211479.