» Articles » PMID: 31899092

Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with an Inlay Glenoid Component: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Activity

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 4
PMID 31899092
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Biomechanical studies show that inlay glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can reduce edge loading and opposite-edge lift-off forces with humeral translation compared with onlay glenoids. However, clinical data for these implants are lacking. We report clinical outcomes and return to activities after anatomic TSA with an inlay glenoid component and a stemless ovoid humeral head in an active, young patient population.

Methods: A retrospective review of TSA with an inlay glenoid component and an ovoid humeral head component was performed for 27 shoulders. Patients were evaluated with patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, and radiographs. Return to occupational and sporting activity, complications, and reoperations were analyzed.

Results: A total of 27 shoulders were available for minimum 2-year follow-up. Age averaged 52.1 years, and 92.6% of shoulders were in male patients. The preoperative Walch grade was A1 or A2 in 15 shoulders (55%), B1 in 8 (30%), and B2 in 4 (15%). Patients showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures, active forward flexion, and external rotation (P < .001) with no reoperations. At an average of 3.7 months, the rate of return to work was 92.6%, with 76.0% of those patients returning to their preoperative occupational demand level. At an average of 9.1 months, 75% of patients who responded to our custom survey returned to sport, with 50% achieving the same level or a higher level of sporting activity. Annual postoperative radiographs revealed no inlay component loosening.

Conclusion: Anatomic TSA with an inlay glenoid coupled with a stemless ovoid humeral head in an active population resulted in improved clinical outcomes, no reoperations or radiographic loosening, and a high rate of return to activity at shorter-term follow-up.

Citing Articles

Arthrosurface of the humeral head with the OVO surface replacement endoprosthesis.

Wrotniak M, Polczak L, Skowron L, Rydel P, Urbanek A, Kostuj M J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 2024(12):rjae794.

PMID: 39697275 PMC: 11655115. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae794.


Achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state following total shoulder arthroplasty with nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid.

Posner A, Kuna M, Puleo J, Carroll J, Hutchinson I, Zimmerman J Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241262742.

PMID: 39574546 PMC: 11577554. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241262742.


Inlay total shoulder arthroplasty in the weight-bearing shoulder of wheelchair-bound patients with paraplegia. A case report.

Blashinsky Z, Latta S, Schurhoff M, Vargas L, Zvijac J, Uribe J Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 124:110373.

PMID: 39388986 PMC: 11562403. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110373.


Recent Advances in the Design and Application of Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Systems and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review.

Twomey-Kozak J, Adu-Kwarteng K, Lunn K, Briggs D, Hurley E, Anakwenze O Orthop Res Rev. 2024; 16:205-220.

PMID: 39081796 PMC: 11288362. DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S312870.


Techniques to Address Humeral Bone Insufficiency During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Nonspherical Humeral Head and Inlay Glenoid.

Posner A, Carroll J, Kuna M, Puleo J, Zimmerman J Arthrosc Tech. 2024; 13(4):102915.

PMID: 38690350 PMC: 11056687. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102915.