» Articles » PMID: 31886148

Maximum Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Patients with Malignant Hemispheric Infarction

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 31
PMID 31886148
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The authors applied maximum external decompression for malignant hemispheric infarction and investigated the functional outcome according to the patient age.

Methods: Twenty-five patients with malignant hemispheric infarction were treated using a hemicraniectomy with maximum external decompression, comprising a larger (>14cm) hemicraniectomy, resection of the temporalis muscle and its fascia, spaciously expansive duraplasty, and approximation of the skin flap. The medical and diagnostic imaging records for the patients were reviewed, and 1-year functional outcome data obtained for the younger group (aged ≤ 60 years) and elderly group (aged > 60 years).

Results: The patients (n=25) who underwent maximum surgical decompression revealed a minimal mortality rate (n=2, 8.0%). The patients (n=14) in the younger group all survived with mRS scores of 2 (n=1, 7.1%), 3 (n=7, 50.0%), 4 (n=3, 21.4%), or 5 (n=3, 21.4%). A majority of the younger patients (57.1% with mRS ≤3) lived with functional independence. When the 1-year mRS scores were dichotomized between favorable (mRS ≤3) and unfavorable (mRS ≥4) outcomes, the younger group had significantly more patients with a favorable outcome than the elderly group (57.1% versus 9.1%, p=0.033). In contrast, in the elderly group, most patients showed unfavorable outcomes with the mRS scores of 4 (n=5, 45.5%), 5 (n=3, 27.3%), or 6 (n=2, 18.2%), whereas only one patient showed favorable outcome (mRS 3). A majority of the elderly patients (45.5% with mRS 4) survived with moderately severe disability.

Conclusion: For malignant hemispheric infarction, a hemicraniectomy with maximum external decompression was found to considerably increase survival with a favorable outcome in functional independence (mRS ≤3) for younger patients aged ≤60 years. It can be optimal surgical treatment for younger patients.

Citing Articles

Large diameter hemicraniectomy does not improve long-term outcome in malignant infarction.

Lehrieder D, Muller H, Kassubek J, Hecht N, Thomalla G, Michalski D J Neurol. 2023; 270(8):4080-4089.

PMID: 37162579 PMC: 10345046. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11766-3.


Decompressive hemicraniectomy for acute ischemic stroke associated with coronavirus disease 2019 infection: Case report and systematic review.

Chan K, Salonga A, Khu K Surg Neurol Int. 2021; 12:116.

PMID: 33880221 PMC: 8053430. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_64_2021.

References
1.
Bruno A, Akinwuntan A, Lin C, Close B, Davis K, Baute V . Simplified modified rankin scale questionnaire: reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life. Stroke. 2011; 42(8):2276-9. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613273. View

2.
Ropper A, Shafran B . Brain edema after stroke. Clinical syndrome and intracranial pressure. Arch Neurol. 1984; 41(1):26-9. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050130032017. View

3.
Robertson S, Lennarson P, Hasan D, Traynelis V . Clinical course and surgical management of massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery. 2004; 55(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000126875.02630.36. View

4.
Geurts M, van der Worp H, Kappelle L, Amelink G, Algra A, Hofmeijer J . Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction: outcomes at 3 years in the randomized HAMLET trial. Stroke. 2013; 44(9):2506-8. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002014. View

5.
Huh J, Shin H, Shin J, Kim T, Hwang Y, Park S . Surgical management of massive cerebral infarction. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008; 42(4):331-6. PMC: 2588216. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.4.331. View