» Articles » PMID: 31880837

State of the Science on Metal Bioavailability Modeling: Introduction to the Outcome of a Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Technical Workshop

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 28
PMID 31880837
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry technical workshop was held in December 2017 to critically evaluate the current state of the science of metal bioavailability modeling. The availability of mechanistic models such as the biotic ligand model and the rapid development of empirical models such as multiple linear regressions means that choices are available in terms of bioavailability normalization approaches that can be used in metal risk assessments and the development of risk-based protective values for aquatic life. A key goal of the workshop was to provide potential users of metal bioavailability models with the information required to make appropriate decisions when choosing among mechanistic and empirical models. Workshop participants focused on the state of the science of metal bioavailability modeling, mechanistic and empirical model frameworks, validation of bioavailability models, and application of bioavailability models in risk-based decision-making approaches. The output of this workshop provides the necessary scientific information to incorporate bioavailability normalization in regulations pertaining to metals in freshwater systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;39:42-47. © 2019 SETAC.

Citing Articles

Development of Fluoride Protective Values for Aquatic Life Using Empirical Bioavailability Models.

Parker S, Wilkes A, Long G, Goulding N, Ghosh R Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021; 41(2):396-409.

PMID: 34813674 PMC: 9303462. DOI: 10.1002/etc.5259.


Statement of the PPR Panel on a framework for conducting the environmental exposure and risk assessment for transition metals when used as active substances in plant protection products (PPP).

Hernandez-Jerez A, Adriaanse P, Aldrich A, Berny P, Coja T, Duquesne S EFSA J. 2021; 19(3):e06498.

PMID: 33815619 PMC: 8006092. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6498.


Development of a bioavailability-based risk assessment framework for nickel in Southeast Asia and Melanesia.

Garman E, Schlekat C, Middleton E, Merrington G, Peters A, Smith R Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021; 17(4):802-813.

PMID: 33404201 PMC: 8359217. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4384.

References
1.
DeForest D, Brix K, Tear L, Adams W . Multiple linear regression models for predicting chronic aluminum toxicity to freshwater aquatic organisms and developing water quality guidelines. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017; 37(1):80-90. DOI: 10.1002/etc.3922. View

2.
Van Genderen E, Stauber J, Delos C, Eignor D, Gensemer R, McGeer J . Best Practices for Derivation and Application of Thresholds for Metals Using Bioavailability-Based Approaches. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019; 39(1):118-130. PMC: 7233455. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4559. View

3.
Paquin P, Gorsuch J, Apte S, Batley G, Bowles K, Campbell P . The biotic ligand model: a historical overview. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002; 133(1-2):3-35. DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0456(02)00112-6. View

4.
Garman E, Meyer J, Bergeron C, Blewett T, Clements W, Elias M . Validation of Bioavailability-Based Toxicity Models for Metals. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019; 39(1):101-117. PMC: 8218924. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4563. View

5.
Brix K, DeForest D, Tear L, Grosell M, Adams W . Use of Multiple Linear Regression Models for Setting Water Quality Criteria for Copper: A Complementary Approach to the Biotic Ligand Model. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(9):5182-5192. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05533. View