» Articles » PMID: 31879718

Arthroscopic-Guided Balloon Tibioplasty in Schatzker III Tibial Plateau Fracture

Overview
Journal Joints
Publisher Thieme
Date 2019 Dec 28
PMID 31879718
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 The study aims to present the results at a mean 28-months follow-up of arthroscopic-guided balloon tibioplasty and to spot some technical tricks and some practice using tools and materials.  The study relates to six patients with tibial plateau fractures type Schatzker III with tibial plateau depression more than 4 mm at preoperative computed tomography scan (CT-scan). The follow-up period ranged from 22 to 33 months, with a mean of 28 months. No patients were lost to follow-up. The patients were evaluated clinically using the Rasmussen score system and Lysholm score systems at 6 to 12 and 24 months, postoperatively. Radiographic evaluations (standard X-rays) were done preoperatively at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively while a CT-scan with 3D reconstruction was performed preoperatively, at the first day and 6 months, postoperatively.  The mean Rasmussen clinical score at 6 months postoperatively was 26.3 while at 1-year postoperatively the mean Rasmussen clinical score was 28.33. At 2-year postoperatively the mean Rasmussen clinical score was 28.83. Statistically significant difference was found in 6-months and 2-years results (  < 0.05). CT-scan achieved the first postoperative day showed the recovery of approximately 70% of the area of the interested tibial plateau, restoring of the joint surface without articular bone free fragments.  The described surgical procedure, if correctly performed with proper indications (Schatzker III), respect the principles mentioned above and the clinical and radiological results confirm our purpose.  This is a therapeutic case series, level IV study.

Citing Articles

Outcomes following balloon tibioplasty versus conventional osteosynthesis techniques for Schatzker type III tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review.

Blankenship A, Singleton A, Hiatt L, Evanson K, Phillips S, Miller R J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):210.

PMID: 35392956 PMC: 8991579. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-02973-1.


Contribution of Minimally Invasive Bone Augmentation With PMMA Cement in Primary Fixation of Schatzker Type II Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Vendeuvre T, Koneazny C, Breque C, Rigoard P, Severyns M, Germaneau A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:840052.

PMID: 35299640 PMC: 8921932. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.840052.


3D surface reconstruction of the femur and tibia from parallel 2D contours.

Lin B, Jin D, Socorro Borges M J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):145.

PMID: 35248091 PMC: 8898446. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-02994-w.


Unilateral locking plate versus unilateral locking plate combined with compression bolt for Schatzker I-IV tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study.

Wang Z, Zheng Z, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Tan Z, Chen W Int Orthop. 2022; 46(5):1133-1143.

PMID: 35106670 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05324-1.

References
1.
Doria C, Balsano M, Spiga M, Mosele G, Puddu L, Caggiari G . Tibioplasty, a new technique in the management of tibial plateau fracture: A multicentric experience review. J Orthop. 2017; 14(1):176-181. PMC: 5220166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.12.002. View

2.
Wang J, Jiang B, Guo W, Zhang W, Li A, Zhao Y . Arthroscopic-assisted balloon tibioplasty versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for treatment of Schatzker II-IV tibial plateau fractures: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(8):e021667. PMC: 6089321. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021667. View

3.
Caspari R, Hutton P, Whipple T, Meyers J . The role of arthroscopy in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Arthroscopy. 1985; 1(2):76-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(85)80035-9. View

4.
Hahnhaussen J, Hak D, Weckbach S, Heiney J, Stahel P . Percutaneous inflation osteoplasty for indirect reduction of depressed tibial plateau fractures. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(9):768-72. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120822-04. View

5.
Petersen W, Zantop T, Raschke M . [Fracture of the tibial head]. Unfallchirurg. 2006; 109(3):219-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1066-9. View